Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on Pathfinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 5066456" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>With respect to the <em>Spell Compendium</em>, there were a number of spells within it that caused my <em>Age of Worms</em> Campaign to die at 14th level.</p><p></p><p>In fact, I think it's fair to say that a vast number number of D&D campaigns died at that power level in 3.5 -- and most for the same reason.</p><p></p><p>While I picked up 4E core and a few in my gaming group did as well, the guys in my gaming circle are all grognards who are resistant when they believe their goodwill has been abused or taken for granted. The loss of <em>Dragon</em> and <em>Dungeon</em> was something that just pissed us off, to be blunt. WotC knew there would be customers who would be alienated by it. There were - there are - and my group of eight in my gaming circle were those types of customers. Coming on to two years later, that emotional ill-will is still rather raw for us. </p><p></p><p>When it came down to it, the guys in my group don't want anything to do with 4E. It's not about play balance, broken spells or power level. Oh you can make an argument about it, but that's not <em><strong>really</strong></em> it (for us). I believe the essence of it is far more <em>emotional</em> and visceral than those arguments could ever capture; the play balance issues become <em>excuses</em> as much as they are actual <em>reasons</em>.</p><p></p><p>It came down to the fact that most members of my gaming cirlcle have been playing 25-30 years. They liked 3.5 and we all had thousands of dollars worth of books invested in it. The revise/reset/re-sell of 4E was simply too soon for my group, and it was handled in a way that antagonized the hell out of us. There are intellectual arguments to be made pro and con, but to cut through it all with a <em><strong>+7 Light Sabre of Truth</strong></em>, it comes down to a visceral reaction on our part.</p><p></p><p>Paizo, on the other hand, created some of the best products of the 3.5 era. Their claim as "spiritual heirs" of the Gygaxian mantle is, at a certain level, every bit as strong as WotC's. We like their products and <em>we <strong>want</strong> to like their game.</em> The intellectual arguments are there if you want to find them - and I'm not saying the logic and reasoning should not have a prominent place in the working out of that decision to buy/play <em>Pathfinder.</em></p><p></p><p>But for all that, the emotional calculus which has lead our group to now move to <em>Pathfinder</em> is as much about goodwill towards the product line and a move towards a new(ish) system at a time when we felt like it, not when some bean counters at WotC thought it was time to sell us some new books we did not need.</p><p></p><p>This is my first post in the General section on ENWorld in almost twenty months -- since the mid-summer of 2008. When I say my group was put-off by the death of <em>Dragon</em> and <em>Dungeon</em> and the birth of 4E ahead of its appointed schedule - I'm not exaggerating. In that admittedly <em><strong>embittered</strong></em> context, choosing to move towards <em>Pathfinder</em> has been an easy sell. </p><p></p><p>Happily, the products themselves are top notch and the <em>Pathfinder Chronicles</em> and accesories line are the best in the industry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 5066456, member: 20741"] With respect to the [I]Spell Compendium[/I], there were a number of spells within it that caused my [I]Age of Worms[/I] Campaign to die at 14th level. In fact, I think it's fair to say that a vast number number of D&D campaigns died at that power level in 3.5 -- and most for the same reason. While I picked up 4E core and a few in my gaming group did as well, the guys in my gaming circle are all grognards who are resistant when they believe their goodwill has been abused or taken for granted. The loss of [I]Dragon[/I] and [I]Dungeon[/I] was something that just pissed us off, to be blunt. WotC knew there would be customers who would be alienated by it. There were - there are - and my group of eight in my gaming circle were those types of customers. Coming on to two years later, that emotional ill-will is still rather raw for us. When it came down to it, the guys in my group don't want anything to do with 4E. It's not about play balance, broken spells or power level. Oh you can make an argument about it, but that's not [I][B]really[/B][/I] it (for us). I believe the essence of it is far more [I]emotional[/I] and visceral than those arguments could ever capture; the play balance issues become [I]excuses[/I] as much as they are actual [I]reasons[/I]. It came down to the fact that most members of my gaming cirlcle have been playing 25-30 years. They liked 3.5 and we all had thousands of dollars worth of books invested in it. The revise/reset/re-sell of 4E was simply too soon for my group, and it was handled in a way that antagonized the hell out of us. There are intellectual arguments to be made pro and con, but to cut through it all with a [I][B]+7 Light Sabre of Truth[/B][/I], it comes down to a visceral reaction on our part. Paizo, on the other hand, created some of the best products of the 3.5 era. Their claim as "spiritual heirs" of the Gygaxian mantle is, at a certain level, every bit as strong as WotC's. We like their products and [I]we [B]want[/B] to like their game.[/I] The intellectual arguments are there if you want to find them - and I'm not saying the logic and reasoning should not have a prominent place in the working out of that decision to buy/play [I]Pathfinder.[/I] But for all that, the emotional calculus which has lead our group to now move to [I]Pathfinder[/I] is as much about goodwill towards the product line and a move towards a new(ish) system at a time when we felt like it, not when some bean counters at WotC thought it was time to sell us some new books we did not need. This is my first post in the General section on ENWorld in almost twenty months -- since the mid-summer of 2008. When I say my group was put-off by the death of [I]Dragon[/I] and [I]Dungeon[/I] and the birth of 4E ahead of its appointed schedule - I'm not exaggerating. In that admittedly [I][B]embittered[/B][/I] context, choosing to move towards [I]Pathfinder[/I] has been an easy sell. Happily, the products themselves are top notch and the [I]Pathfinder Chronicles[/I] and accesories line are the best in the industry. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on Pathfinder
Top