Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5069964" data-attributes="member: 957">Myriad eh?  That's cool.Again, give me an actual example.  One of Monte's modules features a conjoined twin drow wizard / cleric.  I never had a player ask to play a conjoined twin double character.  I guess I just was fortunate to have good players.I guess it would be called an outrageous abuse of rule zero to claim that this would be two characters, each with a significant limitation.  If the issue ever came up.  Which it did not.I'm in no way ignorant of the claims.  But I'll rebut that it has been challenged as not at all the standard state of affairs is the same myriad threads.Yes, there are certainly people who have that problem.  I don't question that.  People do bring problems to the table and try to play against other people at the table, try to "win" D&D.  If you are playing with people with counter-productive attitudes, you are going to be limited.  There is more that can be achieved, but it takes a group that is like minded in their desire to get there.  3E does not impose this problem.  It is silly to claim it does.3E won't SAVE you from that problem.  I guess maybe 4E will.  So if you need to be saved, then you may need to settle for 4E.You can blame it all on 3E, if it makes you feel better.</blockquote>