Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on Pathfinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="billd91" data-source="post: 5071515" data-attributes="member: 3400"><p>There were a lot of people who weren't interested in the Polyhedron content, but you know what? After giving it a go and experimenting with it, Paizo listened to customer feedback and got rid of it. Now you're complaining about their attitude for changing the magazines and doing what you wanted in this context even after you said above, in this very post:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Paizo listens to its customers and it shows in Pathfinder. The public playtest they ran for the Beta generated a lot of feedback that they used to improve the core rules. Certainly not everybody's favorite feedback or ideas made it into the final, but I believe enough did that I have confidence that the designers listened and considered the feedback carefully.</p><p></p><p>But right now, I can't help but wonder where your argument is going. You posted that:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that leaves me wondering just what axe you're grinding. Considering that Paizo set up a webpage for people with subscriptions to choose their options for remaining credit including: shifting to the Pathfinder subscription, getting back issues, getting store credit, or getting a refund, I have ask you if not one, not a single one, of these options was satisfying given the situation or you're just trying to make hyperbolic points in an argument with someone criticizing WotC's customer service. </p><p></p><p>I would say this to anyone interested in Pathfinder or Paizo, they went pretty far to satisfy people with subscriptions extending beyond their control of Dungeon and Dragon magazines. They've done alright by me both in customer service (hey, I didn't care for the Polyhedron content either and was glad they listened to my feedback and removed it) and in revising the 3.5 rule set to produce the Pathfinder game.</p><p></p><p>If you like 3e at all, then PF can be a very good fit and the PDF of the core rules is available for a very low, aggressive price making checking it out not a very heavy burden. Heck, if you like looking at the rules online without the art (which is excellent), you can even find them for free as part of the Pathfinder System Reference Document. In that way, you have nothing to lose in checking it out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="billd91, post: 5071515, member: 3400"] There were a lot of people who weren't interested in the Polyhedron content, but you know what? After giving it a go and experimenting with it, Paizo listened to customer feedback and got rid of it. Now you're complaining about their attitude for changing the magazines and doing what you wanted in this context even after you said above, in this very post: Paizo listens to its customers and it shows in Pathfinder. The public playtest they ran for the Beta generated a lot of feedback that they used to improve the core rules. Certainly not everybody's favorite feedback or ideas made it into the final, but I believe enough did that I have confidence that the designers listened and considered the feedback carefully. But right now, I can't help but wonder where your argument is going. You posted that: And that leaves me wondering just what axe you're grinding. Considering that Paizo set up a webpage for people with subscriptions to choose their options for remaining credit including: shifting to the Pathfinder subscription, getting back issues, getting store credit, or getting a refund, I have ask you if not one, not a single one, of these options was satisfying given the situation or you're just trying to make hyperbolic points in an argument with someone criticizing WotC's customer service. I would say this to anyone interested in Pathfinder or Paizo, they went pretty far to satisfy people with subscriptions extending beyond their control of Dungeon and Dragon magazines. They've done alright by me both in customer service (hey, I didn't care for the Polyhedron content either and was glad they listened to my feedback and removed it) and in revising the 3.5 rule set to produce the Pathfinder game. If you like 3e at all, then PF can be a very good fit and the PDF of the core rules is available for a very low, aggressive price making checking it out not a very heavy burden. Heck, if you like looking at the rules online without the art (which is excellent), you can even find them for free as part of the Pathfinder System Reference Document. In that way, you have nothing to lose in checking it out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on Pathfinder
Top