Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on Pathfinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vyvyan Basterd" data-source="post: 5071932" data-attributes="member: 4892"><p>On-topic: For those who have played Pathfinder, what measures has the Pathfinder team taken towards reducing the phenomenon where high-level combats can often result in a battle of "who wins Initiative?" I don't mean this as a loaded question at all, I'd really like to know. Disclaimer for some: I know this phenomenon might not occur at your table, no need to tell me it doesn't.</p><p></p><p>OFF-TOPIC:</p><p>[SBLOCK]</p><p></p><p>It was not "keep the magazine." I understood the reasons behind the move. What would have satisfied me at the time was a deal on Paizo product I was interested in equivalent to the deal they offered on Pathfinder (that would be the original new AP, not the RPG). They made a decision to offer more to fans of their adventure paths while fans of stand-alone modules were left with lesser store credit. I wasn't satisfied with their decision. Do I hate them for it? Obviously not, since I would buy product from them again if they sold for a system I use (or if I decided I really liked something they offerred enough to buy and convert it).</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Blame denotes that I think they are at fault for something. I don't blame them for any faults. I don't agree with some of their business decisions regarding money I had already paid them, that's it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>IMO, nobody is the bad guy. What people forget on both sides of this is that WotC and Paizo are made up of real people. So when you demonize either company, you are attacking real people making difficult decisions in their day-to-day work. I think people around here should be handed vacations just as easily for attacking a company as when they make personal attacks against another poster.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>In this day and age it is. I'm sorry a form of media you enjoy is dying, but it is. Hope you're not holding your breath on the turnaround of the newspaper indusrty too.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I never said it wasn't speculation. In fact, I think I referred to my own comments as "tin-foil hat territory."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would have liked to see a deal equivalent to option #1, but instead of Pathfinder modules I would have liked Gamemastery modules. Sure, I could have used my credit from option #3 to buy these, but they offered those willing to choose Pathfinder more value for their dollar than the credit was worth.</p><p></p><p>[/SBLOCK]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vyvyan Basterd, post: 5071932, member: 4892"] On-topic: For those who have played Pathfinder, what measures has the Pathfinder team taken towards reducing the phenomenon where high-level combats can often result in a battle of "who wins Initiative?" I don't mean this as a loaded question at all, I'd really like to know. Disclaimer for some: I know this phenomenon might not occur at your table, no need to tell me it doesn't. OFF-TOPIC: [SBLOCK] It was not "keep the magazine." I understood the reasons behind the move. What would have satisfied me at the time was a deal on Paizo product I was interested in equivalent to the deal they offered on Pathfinder (that would be the original new AP, not the RPG). They made a decision to offer more to fans of their adventure paths while fans of stand-alone modules were left with lesser store credit. I wasn't satisfied with their decision. Do I hate them for it? Obviously not, since I would buy product from them again if they sold for a system I use (or if I decided I really liked something they offerred enough to buy and convert it). Blame denotes that I think they are at fault for something. I don't blame them for any faults. I don't agree with some of their business decisions regarding money I had already paid them, that's it. IMO, nobody is the bad guy. What people forget on both sides of this is that WotC and Paizo are made up of real people. So when you demonize either company, you are attacking real people making difficult decisions in their day-to-day work. I think people around here should be handed vacations just as easily for attacking a company as when they make personal attacks against another poster. In this day and age it is. I'm sorry a form of media you enjoy is dying, but it is. Hope you're not holding your breath on the turnaround of the newspaper indusrty too. I never said it wasn't speculation. In fact, I think I referred to my own comments as "tin-foil hat territory." I would have liked to see a deal equivalent to option #1, but instead of Pathfinder modules I would have liked Gamemastery modules. Sure, I could have used my credit from option #3 to buy these, but they offered those willing to choose Pathfinder more value for their dollar than the credit was worth. [/SBLOCK] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Opinions on Pathfinder
Top