Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Opinions on the 4E preview books...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Voss" data-source="post: 4005418" data-attributes="member: 57593"><p>Blood War, Tanari and Baatzu would be easier to control as IPs than something as nebulous as god vs primordial conflict. On the other hand, a lot of the monsters in the MM are getting the compound names (Blackwoods Dryad, and other adjectivenoun monsters) specifically for more IP control. They can't claim rights to dryads as a whole, but they can make claims to blackwoods dryads, and related concepts. Which is why the Feywild is not Faerie and the Shadowfell isn't just Shadow or Shade. </p><p></p><p>So I do think the IP issues are real, but I suspect they don't dwell on them for reasons other than dishonesty. Short version: its dull. It doesn't sell the preview books or 4e itself. Is it important? Sure. Legal claims are part and parcel of the modern world.</p><p></p><p>As far as DDI goes, I think its irrelevant. There isn't much of a functional way to require it. Even if they hide half-orcs and bards in it, I honestly don't care. If it isn't actually in the books, I'm under no compulsion to pay extra money to use the material. And at the table, I really don't think any of the DDI features are actually useful.</p><p></p><p>And ultimately, I don't think its a project they can maintain. They're failing to manage the content-light preview version, and I don't think its going to get any better. They also don't have any reasonable means of protecting the material either. If one person in a group of 5 pays for a month of service every 6 to 12 months, downloads everything the group wants, and then cancels their subscription, there isn't much WotC can do about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Voss, post: 4005418, member: 57593"] Blood War, Tanari and Baatzu would be easier to control as IPs than something as nebulous as god vs primordial conflict. On the other hand, a lot of the monsters in the MM are getting the compound names (Blackwoods Dryad, and other adjectivenoun monsters) specifically for more IP control. They can't claim rights to dryads as a whole, but they can make claims to blackwoods dryads, and related concepts. Which is why the Feywild is not Faerie and the Shadowfell isn't just Shadow or Shade. So I do think the IP issues are real, but I suspect they don't dwell on them for reasons other than dishonesty. Short version: its dull. It doesn't sell the preview books or 4e itself. Is it important? Sure. Legal claims are part and parcel of the modern world. As far as DDI goes, I think its irrelevant. There isn't much of a functional way to require it. Even if they hide half-orcs and bards in it, I honestly don't care. If it isn't actually in the books, I'm under no compulsion to pay extra money to use the material. And at the table, I really don't think any of the DDI features are actually useful. And ultimately, I don't think its a project they can maintain. They're failing to manage the content-light preview version, and I don't think its going to get any better. They also don't have any reasonable means of protecting the material either. If one person in a group of 5 pays for a month of service every 6 to 12 months, downloads everything the group wants, and then cancels their subscription, there isn't much WotC can do about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Opinions on the 4E preview books...
Top