Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="drquestion" data-source="post: 1007859" data-attributes="member: 5810">I think that in this particular situation, I would find the rate of change annoying - 3 levels seems like a lot to go up in 3 months that isn't directly being played out.  I realize that 3 levels in 3 months of game time isn't an absurd rate in 3e, but to level that fast without any actuall roleplaying wouldn't sit well with me.  If the party had been at its previous level for a reasonable amount of time, I wouldn't have a problem with the DM letting each player explain what he or she had been doing during the war, and letting everyone go up to the next level (clearing the slate, as it were), but 3 seems awfully excessive.On the other hand, I could see where a campaign that periodically let 5 or so years pass, with players explaining what their characters were up to during that time, and then picked up again with everyone being a few levels higher to reflect the passed time, could be potentially very interesting.</blockquote>