Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="SageMinerve" data-source="post: 5824055" data-attributes="member: 69067">IMO opposed rolls wouldn't add THAT MUCH to time spent in combat: instead of looking up a number, you look up a number, add a dice throw and voilà.What turns combat into loooong booooring things are, again IMO:1) The number of different options the PCs have when it's their attack; this tends to be way worse:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">in later editions of the game;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">as players go up in levels;</li> </ul>2) The level of tactical details that comes with using a battle map.I'm willing to bet anything that a 1st or 2nd edition combat with opposed rolls added will still be WAY faster thatn any 3rd or 4th edition combat.All of this to say that I personnaly wouldn't turn down the "opposed rolls" mechanic based only on combat length.</blockquote>