Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Optimization and optimizers...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9696210" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I mean, I accept that may be how you choose to use the word, but if you interpret other people as meaning that, you're just intentionally confusing yourself. And if you use "optimized" without any clarification, to mean that, you're just confusing others.</p><p></p><p>It's anti-communication. I mean, it's not totally uncommon for people to do something like this (especially within fan subcultures), but who does it help? Why not use the term in the way it's vastly more widely used, especially given that wider meaning is itself relevant?</p><p></p><p>Also re: 0% - is it though? I think you're assuming a very uncreative player who isn't actually good at optimizing. If you have a player who is highly engaged with the rules of a game, it's not particularly tricky to work all the major synergistic factors. That's just a MM race with two PHB Feats - the idea that only some sort of demented genius could come up with that, and thus everyone else got it from them is just bloody silly. Sure if a player who'd never shown any aptitude for optimization came to me with that I might be a bit suspicious, but if one of the smarter players did, no. This isn't some 3.5E deal requiring a PrC from an obscure splatbook, 3 Feats from different splatbooks, and a modified version of a base class from yet another splatbook or something. Also, it's not "broken", just annoying (and no longer works, as of 2024).</p><p></p><p>All that said I tend to dislike that particular kind of build because it tends to rapidly bore players who play it, in my experience. I think this is an optimization issue we've kind of failed to discuss - some optimizers manage to optimize the fun out of the game for themselves! That happens a lot more with videogames than TTRPGs, but I've seen people come up with TTRPG builds that worked really well, didn't break the game, but that the player had clearly like, specialized into a role that wasn't actually how they liked playing. I've seen this even with truly harmless support-oriented characters. So anyone optimizing should watch out that they aren't just making a PC that's going to bore them! Of course this is true of poorly-optimized PCs as well, so it's a balance - I've seen many people get bored of PCs who were just terrible at their job because the person building them hadn't understood how to do so, or made some key Bad Decision (like having a low score in a vital stat for that job). Hell I've been the latter!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9696210, member: 18"] I mean, I accept that may be how you choose to use the word, but if you interpret other people as meaning that, you're just intentionally confusing yourself. And if you use "optimized" without any clarification, to mean that, you're just confusing others. It's anti-communication. I mean, it's not totally uncommon for people to do something like this (especially within fan subcultures), but who does it help? Why not use the term in the way it's vastly more widely used, especially given that wider meaning is itself relevant? Also re: 0% - is it though? I think you're assuming a very uncreative player who isn't actually good at optimizing. If you have a player who is highly engaged with the rules of a game, it's not particularly tricky to work all the major synergistic factors. That's just a MM race with two PHB Feats - the idea that only some sort of demented genius could come up with that, and thus everyone else got it from them is just bloody silly. Sure if a player who'd never shown any aptitude for optimization came to me with that I might be a bit suspicious, but if one of the smarter players did, no. This isn't some 3.5E deal requiring a PrC from an obscure splatbook, 3 Feats from different splatbooks, and a modified version of a base class from yet another splatbook or something. Also, it's not "broken", just annoying (and no longer works, as of 2024). All that said I tend to dislike that particular kind of build because it tends to rapidly bore players who play it, in my experience. I think this is an optimization issue we've kind of failed to discuss - some optimizers manage to optimize the fun out of the game for themselves! That happens a lot more with videogames than TTRPGs, but I've seen people come up with TTRPG builds that worked really well, didn't break the game, but that the player had clearly like, specialized into a role that wasn't actually how they liked playing. I've seen this even with truly harmless support-oriented characters. So anyone optimizing should watch out that they aren't just making a PC that's going to bore them! Of course this is true of poorly-optimized PCs as well, so it's a balance - I've seen many people get bored of PCs who were just terrible at their job because the person building them hadn't understood how to do so, or made some key Bad Decision (like having a low score in a vital stat for that job). Hell I've been the latter! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Optimization and optimizers...
Top