Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Optimization and optimizers...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9696303" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>The only real difference is mindset.</p><p></p><p>The actual characters at the table may well be identical, mechanically - they'll just be played very differently!</p><p></p><p>Someone who plays something they don't even like, simply because it's powerful and that's all that matters to them, not even having actual fun, is, frankly, at best a rather immature/childish individual, because TTRPGs aren't about winning/losing (c.f. the thread discussing this). That's kind of the true munchkin spirit - so into "winning", that they'll do anything, even playing a PC they hate!</p><p></p><p>When I was a teenager I actually saw that in action - one of the players, who was going through some stuff at that point in his life (not that we were wise enough to realize it), had become a total munchkin, and ended up playing some kind of ludicrous character who he just didn't even like at all, I think in SLA Industries. </p><p></p><p>What was really sad was his character wasn't even that good - he'd messed up because he didn't understand the mechanics as well as he thought, and he ended up playing a character who he both hated because he didn't want to be a skinned-horse-looking dude (I remember this so it has to be SLA Industries I think unless there were similar races in other gun-oriented games), but who was also not as good at killing people as the other PCs were (and wasn't good at anything else, either).</p><p></p><p>That's part of what this discussion is missing, because most people are operating in 5E D&D in 2025 mindset and thinking "Oh well you can just look up OP builds online!", but that's not true for 99% of RPGs out there, and it's not true historically either. People assume "breaking the game" is successful, but the very people most prone to try and make "broken" builds are often not successful, in my experience (or are one DM ruling - not even a "house rule", just a decision on an unclear point - away from being un-broken), and I think that factors in and helps also to identify people who are going to be an issue.</p><p></p><p>The real problem, when we zoom out, isn't "optimization", it's just players with bad attitudes. The relevant subset of that problem here is "players who think TTRPGs are about winning and losing". The subset that subset that causes most of this grief and annoyance is what I'd call "munchkins" (other people may have other terms, it's petty nonsense to pretend I'm demanding that one, but we should avoid vagueness like "optimizer" for this) - i.e. players who:</p><p></p><p>A) Think you can "win" TTRPGs</p><p></p><p>And</p><p></p><p>B) Think they should do absolutely everything they can in order to do so! </p><p></p><p>But they're not the only subset of that "players who think TTRPGs are about winning and losing" group - hell one of the others is "people who continually obsess about the power of other PCs and fulminate about it", which I've seen from actively anti-optimization people (as well as pro-optimization ones). Bad attitudes are the problem and they're definitely not limited to "optimizers".</p><p></p><p>TLDR ("you" is directed at munchkins here, not people in the thread):</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]410261[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9696303, member: 18"] The only real difference is mindset. The actual characters at the table may well be identical, mechanically - they'll just be played very differently! Someone who plays something they don't even like, simply because it's powerful and that's all that matters to them, not even having actual fun, is, frankly, at best a rather immature/childish individual, because TTRPGs aren't about winning/losing (c.f. the thread discussing this). That's kind of the true munchkin spirit - so into "winning", that they'll do anything, even playing a PC they hate! When I was a teenager I actually saw that in action - one of the players, who was going through some stuff at that point in his life (not that we were wise enough to realize it), had become a total munchkin, and ended up playing some kind of ludicrous character who he just didn't even like at all, I think in SLA Industries. What was really sad was his character wasn't even that good - he'd messed up because he didn't understand the mechanics as well as he thought, and he ended up playing a character who he both hated because he didn't want to be a skinned-horse-looking dude (I remember this so it has to be SLA Industries I think unless there were similar races in other gun-oriented games), but who was also not as good at killing people as the other PCs were (and wasn't good at anything else, either). That's part of what this discussion is missing, because most people are operating in 5E D&D in 2025 mindset and thinking "Oh well you can just look up OP builds online!", but that's not true for 99% of RPGs out there, and it's not true historically either. People assume "breaking the game" is successful, but the very people most prone to try and make "broken" builds are often not successful, in my experience (or are one DM ruling - not even a "house rule", just a decision on an unclear point - away from being un-broken), and I think that factors in and helps also to identify people who are going to be an issue. The real problem, when we zoom out, isn't "optimization", it's just players with bad attitudes. The relevant subset of that problem here is "players who think TTRPGs are about winning and losing". The subset that subset that causes most of this grief and annoyance is what I'd call "munchkins" (other people may have other terms, it's petty nonsense to pretend I'm demanding that one, but we should avoid vagueness like "optimizer" for this) - i.e. players who: A) Think you can "win" TTRPGs And B) Think they should do absolutely everything they can in order to do so! But they're not the only subset of that "players who think TTRPGs are about winning and losing" group - hell one of the others is "people who continually obsess about the power of other PCs and fulminate about it", which I've seen from actively anti-optimization people (as well as pro-optimization ones). Bad attitudes are the problem and they're definitely not limited to "optimizers". TLDR ("you" is directed at munchkins here, not people in the thread): [ATTACH type="full" size="500x714"]410261[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Optimization and optimizers...
Top