Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Options and Multiclassing...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FourthBear" data-source="post: 4298159" data-attributes="member: 55846"><p>Yes, taking the basic multiclass feat means that you qualify as a member of that class for feats and paragon paths. Many paragon paths have only class requirements to get in. The primary exceptions to this are the warlock and ranger classes, whose paragon paths also include requirements like a specific fighting style or pact. I suspect this will handled in errata, but I think waiving those requirements for multiclassed characters is reasonable. </p><p></p><p>Note that none of this ever gives the basic class features of the other class. For example, in RAW, multiclassing in ranger will never give you the quarry bonus except for once per encounter. This may not matter for some builds, but some ranger powers and path features benefit from having multiple or long-lasting quarry status. From early design blogs, I suspect that the designers at one point created specific paragon paths for multiclassing PCs that granted these basic features and powers that made sense for such characters. My guess is that we'll see these being published or made by third parties.</p><p></p><p>Actually, now that I think of it, I really do wish they had included a specific paragon path for multiclassed characters and *not* allowed multiclassers easy access to the other paragon paths. I think that paragon paths should really be a significant plus for PCs who keep a strong, in-class focus. I dislike character building that finds ways to create extremely effective characters by combining unintended cross-class synergies, although I realize that I'm a minority in this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FourthBear, post: 4298159, member: 55846"] Yes, taking the basic multiclass feat means that you qualify as a member of that class for feats and paragon paths. Many paragon paths have only class requirements to get in. The primary exceptions to this are the warlock and ranger classes, whose paragon paths also include requirements like a specific fighting style or pact. I suspect this will handled in errata, but I think waiving those requirements for multiclassed characters is reasonable. Note that none of this ever gives the basic class features of the other class. For example, in RAW, multiclassing in ranger will never give you the quarry bonus except for once per encounter. This may not matter for some builds, but some ranger powers and path features benefit from having multiple or long-lasting quarry status. From early design blogs, I suspect that the designers at one point created specific paragon paths for multiclassing PCs that granted these basic features and powers that made sense for such characters. My guess is that we'll see these being published or made by third parties. Actually, now that I think of it, I really do wish they had included a specific paragon path for multiclassed characters and *not* allowed multiclassers easy access to the other paragon paths. I think that paragon paths should really be a significant plus for PCs who keep a strong, in-class focus. I dislike character building that finds ways to create extremely effective characters by combining unintended cross-class synergies, although I realize that I'm a minority in this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Options and Multiclassing...
Top