Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8058018" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>You’re disagreeing with a position I’ve never espoused. I don’t think 5e would be better if they had made the same mistakes they made with 4e. Obviously - the mistakes they made with 4e harmed the brand, and addressing them was a big part of the point of making 5e. I do, however, think that a lot of good design ideas (not mistakes) got thrown out, just because they came from 4e. I think that 5e could have been better if it had been more concerned with taking the best parts of each edition and discarding the worst parts than with making a show of doing away with 4e. I’m not saying 5e should be just like 4e. I’m saying there were some design innovations made by 4e that could have improved 5e, but got left by the wayside simply because they were from 4e.</p></blockquote><p></p>