Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8929572" data-attributes="member: 42582">What theory or method of contractual interpretation are you applying?I told you which one I'm applying: plain meaning, reinforced by the contrast with the second sentence which confines the scope of the promise to works containing OGC.What is actually absurd is reading weeks of posts arguing how outrageous it is that WotC should try to avoid its contractual obligations by way of strained interpretation, only to now have one of those posters arguing that the contract is not binding on the other parties to it.The OGL isn't a gift. It's a contract. WotC have conferred permissions in relation to their material. In exchange they have extracted promises in relation to their material. It's not that complicated, at its core.</blockquote>