Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jeremy" data-source="post: 1328335" data-attributes="member: 4036">Perhaps, perhaps not.&nbsp; It could have been created figuring an orc warlord would be a barbarian 3 rogue 4 aristocrat 2 for an orc who is a leader and a thinker who becomes a warlord.&nbsp; Maybe like a Warchief Thrall (who started out a slave of humans).&nbsp; Thus the base attack requirement is low, but the feat requirements require that the character have been around the block a few times.&nbsp;But I doubt it.&nbsp; Not when the base attack requirement, class ability requirement, and skill requirements are all those of a 5th level barbarian.&nbsp; More likely again, it just didn't occur to the author that leadership couldn't be taken until 6th, thus delaying the class so long.&nbsp;Like I said, I would have no problem with a PC or NPC being a barbarian 6 warlord 1.&nbsp; The class is not incredibly powerful in any area that would warrant much nitpicking on my part.&nbsp; If it suits the game, by all means.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jeremy, post: 1328335, member: 4036"] Perhaps, perhaps not. It could have been created figuring an orc warlord would be a barbarian 3 rogue 4 aristocrat 2 for an orc who is a leader and a thinker who becomes a warlord. Maybe like a Warchief Thrall (who started out a slave of humans). Thus the base attack requirement is low, but the feat requirements require that the character have been around the block a few times. But I doubt it. Not when the base attack requirement, class ability requirement, and skill requirements are all those of a 5th level barbarian. More likely again, it just didn't occur to the author that leadership couldn't be taken until 6th, thus delaying the class so long. Like I said, I would have no problem with a PC or NPC being a barbarian 6 warlord 1. The class is not incredibly powerful in any area that would warrant much nitpicking on my part. If it suits the game, by all means. [/QUOTE]

Verification