Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sir Osis of Liver" data-source="post: 116284" data-attributes="member: 2427">OK, I really liked it, the CG didn't really bother me at all. I thought it really took the fights to a level of coolness not possible with live actors. I mean they're vampires they should be super humanly quick and strong, the use of CG really let them emphisize that in a way the first movie didn't. Second thing you need to remember is Blade is based off a comic book series, that means you're not going to get the classic vampire horror flick. The plot while far from perfect was still good, it was strongly tied to the first movie, which you don't see a lot in movie sequals, and it was a lot more complex than the first one.For me the biggest disapointment was they didn't keep that cool samurai vamp around and developed him a little more, i thought he had a lot of potential.on a sacle of one to ten, i'd give Blade 2 a 6 or 7. It was well above avarge, but not an instant classic. I'd definatly recomend seeing it and judgeing for yourself though.As for resident evil, i probably would have seen it if they hadn't dogged out Bruce Campbell. That put it insantly on my wait for tape list.</blockquote>