Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[OT] Counting cards. What is it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guilt Puppy" data-source="post: 1087151" data-attributes="member: 6521"><p>Yeah, I came up with that "double your bet on a loss" tactic first night I went to a casino... Eventually wrote a program to run through it statistically (using what odds I could find for basic strategy)... Even including doubling and 3-to-2 payoff for blackjack, the method still somehow ended up tilting the odds even more into the casino's favor. Not sure <em>why</em>, exactly (except perhaps that losses grow exponentially while winnings grow linearly, so when you reach the cut-off point of either losses or wins the losses are grossly disproportionate), but it's how the numbers came up.</p><p></p><p>A variant of this -- where you increase you bet on losses, decrease it on wins -- tends to work a bit better in practice... It capitalizes on the properties of randomness (that you will usually see strings of the same result; which is to say, that it will not be evenly, or non-randomly, distributed.) much better than the doubling method -- that's pretty much asking randomness to come whoop you in the butt.</p><p></p><p>Statistically, though, your best odds of winning big at blackjack (not including card-counting) is placing one big bet -- however much you're willing to lose. You have just short of a 50% chance of doubling this, plus a little bonus if you hit blackjack. Any other betting system requires you to play more hands, which simply means your net wins/losses will deviate less and less from the statistical norm -- in short, you'll be paying the house.</p><p></p><p>And of course, statistically, with very few exceptions, the impact of the house edge can be best minimized by not playing at all.</p><p></p><p>(As a total aside, anyone ever noticed how like D&D a poker game can be? There's that same mix of IT players who micromanage statistics and old-school players who just have a feel for the game, there's some acting involved, even kings and queens, and when people act out of turn, the dealer/DM gets really annoyed. Not to mention the ratio of men to women involved in the game... I dunno, I was watching the World Series of Poker and I just couldn't shake the feeling that like, a good half these guys had played D&D at some point or another.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guilt Puppy, post: 1087151, member: 6521"] Yeah, I came up with that "double your bet on a loss" tactic first night I went to a casino... Eventually wrote a program to run through it statistically (using what odds I could find for basic strategy)... Even including doubling and 3-to-2 payoff for blackjack, the method still somehow ended up tilting the odds even more into the casino's favor. Not sure [i]why[/i], exactly (except perhaps that losses grow exponentially while winnings grow linearly, so when you reach the cut-off point of either losses or wins the losses are grossly disproportionate), but it's how the numbers came up. A variant of this -- where you increase you bet on losses, decrease it on wins -- tends to work a bit better in practice... It capitalizes on the properties of randomness (that you will usually see strings of the same result; which is to say, that it will not be evenly, or non-randomly, distributed.) much better than the doubling method -- that's pretty much asking randomness to come whoop you in the butt. Statistically, though, your best odds of winning big at blackjack (not including card-counting) is placing one big bet -- however much you're willing to lose. You have just short of a 50% chance of doubling this, plus a little bonus if you hit blackjack. Any other betting system requires you to play more hands, which simply means your net wins/losses will deviate less and less from the statistical norm -- in short, you'll be paying the house. And of course, statistically, with very few exceptions, the impact of the house edge can be best minimized by not playing at all. (As a total aside, anyone ever noticed how like D&D a poker game can be? There's that same mix of IT players who micromanage statistics and old-school players who just have a feel for the game, there's some acting involved, even kings and queens, and when people act out of turn, the dealer/DM gets really annoyed. Not to mention the ratio of men to women involved in the game... I dunno, I was watching the World Series of Poker and I just couldn't shake the feeling that like, a good half these guys had played D&D at some point or another.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[OT] Counting cards. What is it?
Top