Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kkoie" data-source="post: 180983" data-attributes="member: 1160">Ticked off?&nbsp; Why are you letting something as simple as computer animation even making you mad in the first place?!I suppose the idea that creating a CGI Jar Jar Binks was more realistic than having some guy walk around in a suit just isn't a realistic reason huh?&nbsp; I think you are judging Jar Jar not on the fact that it is CGI but by the FACT that you simply didn't like the character.&nbsp; I think computers has nothing to do with it.Interesting, well what about the fact that the origonal star wars were later redone with CGI?&nbsp; I suppose that was bad as well despite the fact that it improved the film?Now you are just being silly and nitpicky!&nbsp; Using real actors and CGI combine about as well as using real actors and puppets, if not more so!&nbsp; At least with cgi the character looks natural.&nbsp; Not a lot can be said of the puppets.Well it is wrong to judge all of CGI in all movies based upon poor work.&nbsp; Not all cgi is cheap looking.&nbsp; The backgrounds from the star wars films are examples of about as good as it can get.Oh thats not so sickening, what I find truely sickening are all those nut jobs who go out and spend tons of money supporting cinematic trash like The Scorpion King and other films that are at best, mediocre as heck, and at worst, total garbage.&nbsp; NOW that is SICKENING.K Koie</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kkoie, post: 180983, member: 1160"] Ticked off? Why are you letting something as simple as computer animation even making you mad in the first place?! I suppose the idea that creating a CGI Jar Jar Binks was more realistic than having some guy walk around in a suit just isn't a realistic reason huh? I think you are judging Jar Jar not on the fact that it is CGI but by the FACT that you simply didn't like the character. I think computers has nothing to do with it. Interesting, well what about the fact that the origonal star wars were later redone with CGI? I suppose that was bad as well despite the fact that it improved the film? Now you are just being silly and nitpicky! Using real actors and CGI combine about as well as using [i] real actors and puppets[/i], if not more so! At least with cgi the character looks natural. Not a lot can be said of the puppets. Well it is wrong to judge all of CGI in all movies based upon poor work. Not all cgi is cheap looking. The backgrounds from the star wars films are examples of about as good as it can get. Oh thats not so sickening, what I find truely sickening are all those nut jobs who go out and spend tons of money supporting cinematic trash like The Scorpion King and other films that are at best, mediocre as heck, and at worst, total garbage. NOW that is SICKENING. K Koie [/QUOTE]

Verification