Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[OT] I bit a bullet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jezrael" data-source="post: 64150" data-attributes="member: 1591"><p><strong>Bit one bullet</strong></p><p></p><p>You stated earlier that evolutionary theory is essentially true. However, you have now claimed that it is foolish to believe in God without certain, irrevocable proof that she exists. The problem is that there is no certain proof that evolutionary theory is true - even though there is overwhelming evidence that it is true. So it seems that you require certain, irrevocable proof for God's existence, but accept evolutionary theory without certain proof. So you've got a choice:</p><p></p><p>Bite a bullet and claim that a higher standard of proof is required for belief in God than for belief in evolution.</p><p></p><p>Take a hit, conceding that there is a contradiction in your responses.</p><p></p><p>The question I answered that makes this a bite the bullet/direct hit was...</p><p></p><p>"Evolutionary theory may be false in some matters of detail but it is essentially true" </p><p></p><p>Quite the loaded question, as it didn't ask me which parts of evolutionary theory I thought were true (microevolution vs. macroevolution). The matters of detail in which I think evolution is true is of great importance. By answering this question, I could be saying, yes I think things evolve on the small scale; for example adaptation, which I believe is the first evolutionary step...ah screw it let me just say this is stupid and get it over with.</p><p></p><p>Ok, now that I've said the quiz was stupid (and I feel so much better, mmm catharsis) let me explain.</p><p></p><p>Basically it all boils down to the fact that until someone can show more concrete proof than the fact that we're related to monkeys (which there may be and I'd be happy to see) that macroevolution is crap but microevolution, such as adaptation is OK as it can be seen if not every day then quite often (like those moths that changed color so they could blend in with all the smog better).</p><p></p><p>Of course some people could argue that adaptation and evolution aren't the same but hey, we're all entitled to our perceptions and opinions.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Edited for some really gruesome grammar</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jezrael, post: 64150, member: 1591"] [b]Bit one bullet[/b] You stated earlier that evolutionary theory is essentially true. However, you have now claimed that it is foolish to believe in God without certain, irrevocable proof that she exists. The problem is that there is no certain proof that evolutionary theory is true - even though there is overwhelming evidence that it is true. So it seems that you require certain, irrevocable proof for God's existence, but accept evolutionary theory without certain proof. So you've got a choice: Bite a bullet and claim that a higher standard of proof is required for belief in God than for belief in evolution. Take a hit, conceding that there is a contradiction in your responses. The question I answered that makes this a bite the bullet/direct hit was... "Evolutionary theory may be false in some matters of detail but it is essentially true" Quite the loaded question, as it didn't ask me which parts of evolutionary theory I thought were true (microevolution vs. macroevolution). The matters of detail in which I think evolution is true is of great importance. By answering this question, I could be saying, yes I think things evolve on the small scale; for example adaptation, which I believe is the first evolutionary step...ah screw it let me just say this is stupid and get it over with. Ok, now that I've said the quiz was stupid (and I feel so much better, mmm catharsis) let me explain. Basically it all boils down to the fact that until someone can show more concrete proof than the fact that we're related to monkeys (which there may be and I'd be happy to see) that macroevolution is crap but microevolution, such as adaptation is OK as it can be seen if not every day then quite often (like those moths that changed color so they could blend in with all the smog better). Of course some people could argue that adaptation and evolution aren't the same but hey, we're all entitled to our perceptions and opinions. Edit: Edited for some really gruesome grammar [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[OT] I bit a bullet
Top