Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[OT] I'm a sad, sorry excuse.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Assenpfeffer" data-source="post: 1127685" data-attributes="member: 9061"><p>Remember that "critics" and "the Academy" are not the same audience. More than once in recent memory critics have lavished praise upon a film and flagged it for certaion Oscar nominations, and when the awards happen the film comes up totally empty. <em>The Truman Show</em> might be the most obvious and recent example of this.</p><p></p><p>And while the Academy does indeed seem to like costume dramas, I don't think that in itself led to SiL (a pretty good and very entertaining movie) beating out SPR, which I though was clearly the better film. SPR was hard to take, while SiL was easily digestable for almost everyone.</p><p></p><p>I loathe Gwynneth Paltrow, by the way. Possibly the most overrated actress of her generation. Watch SiL (in which she's watchable), then watch Cate Blanchett's <em>Elizabeth</em> and tell me who was more deserving of an award.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hoo, boy, did I feel that way. The only movie to put me to sleep before the opening credits started rolling.</p><p></p><p>After forcing myself to stay awake and sit through it, though, it does have some good points. But it's not Best Picture material, in my opinion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, Spider-Man won't be nominated for best picture beacuse it doesn't deserve to be. Yes, it's highly entertaining, and I loved it and bought it the day it came out on DVD. And it's one of the shining examples of its genre. But in no way was the film deserving of a best picture nod - it's a well-done movie, but not a great one from the cimematic perspective. (I could have seen Willem Dafoe get a Best Supporting actor nomination out of it, though.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Annie Hall</em> is a well-loved classic, a great movie that more than deserved the award at the time. 25 years later, in retrospect it's very clear that <em>Star Wars</em> is the more important and influential film. But <em>Annie Hall</em> in no way stole the prize from SW, and one can hardly fault the Academy for not forseeing the long-term influence of <em>Star Wars</em>.</p><p></p><p>In general terms, however, I wholeheartedly agree - the Oscar goes to the wrong film with distressing regularity. Not <em>every</em> time. But often enough to be annoying. Certainly some films which win Best Picture are forgotten, while others who are overlooked retain a faithful following for decades and have far-reaching influence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Assenpfeffer, post: 1127685, member: 9061"] Remember that "critics" and "the Academy" are not the same audience. More than once in recent memory critics have lavished praise upon a film and flagged it for certaion Oscar nominations, and when the awards happen the film comes up totally empty. [i]The Truman Show[/i] might be the most obvious and recent example of this. And while the Academy does indeed seem to like costume dramas, I don't think that in itself led to SiL (a pretty good and very entertaining movie) beating out SPR, which I though was clearly the better film. SPR was hard to take, while SiL was easily digestable for almost everyone. I loathe Gwynneth Paltrow, by the way. Possibly the most overrated actress of her generation. Watch SiL (in which she's watchable), then watch Cate Blanchett's [i]Elizabeth[/i] and tell me who was more deserving of an award. Hoo, boy, did I feel that way. The only movie to put me to sleep before the opening credits started rolling. After forcing myself to stay awake and sit through it, though, it does have some good points. But it's not Best Picture material, in my opinion. Actually, Spider-Man won't be nominated for best picture beacuse it doesn't deserve to be. Yes, it's highly entertaining, and I loved it and bought it the day it came out on DVD. And it's one of the shining examples of its genre. But in no way was the film deserving of a best picture nod - it's a well-done movie, but not a great one from the cimematic perspective. (I could have seen Willem Dafoe get a Best Supporting actor nomination out of it, though.) [i]Annie Hall[/i] is a well-loved classic, a great movie that more than deserved the award at the time. 25 years later, in retrospect it's very clear that [i]Star Wars[/i] is the more important and influential film. But [i]Annie Hall[/i] in no way stole the prize from SW, and one can hardly fault the Academy for not forseeing the long-term influence of [i]Star Wars[/i]. In general terms, however, I wholeheartedly agree - the Oscar goes to the wrong film with distressing regularity. Not [i]every[/i] time. But often enough to be annoying. Certainly some films which win Best Picture are forgotten, while others who are overlooked retain a faithful following for decades and have far-reaching influence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[OT] I'm a sad, sorry excuse.
Top