Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[OT] mathematical query
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Sigil" data-source="post: 352947" data-attributes="member: 2013"><p>One last time, REAL SLOWLY...</p><p></p><p>1.) <u>Woman with kids:</u></p><p></p><p>4 possibilities.</p><p>MM</p><p>MF</p><p>FM</p><p>FF</p><p></p><p>All have equal odds. 50% chance of having one child of each gender.</p><p></p><p>2. <u>Man with picture of son:</u></p><p>4 possibilities</p><p>MM</p><p>MF</p><p>FM</p><p>FF</p><p></p><p>All have equal odds. When he shows a picture of his son, we do NOT then have "MX" and we do not have "XM." We have "MX or XM" which is much different. All we learn is that FF is impossible. In other words, all we learn is that we are chatting with someone from one of the first three groups. That leaves us with a 67% chance of having one child of each gender.</p><p></p><p>3. <u>Pick, reveal, ask to switch:</u></p><p>9 possibilities ("choice picked" and "right choice"):</p><p>AA</p><p>AB</p><p>AC</p><p>BA</p><p>BB</p><p>BC</p><p>CA</p><p>CB</p><p>CC</p><p></p><p>We have a one in three chance of being right (AA, BB, CC). When a choice is revealed to be wrong, provided it is NOT the choice we have chosen (bloody loophole-searchers), we get the following:</p><p>AA (B or C)</p><p>AB (C)</p><p>AC (B)</p><p>BA (C)</p><p>BB (A or C)</p><p>BC (A)</p><p>CA (B)</p><p>CB (A)</p><p>CC (A or B)</p><p></p><p>The above all have equal probability - and we are still right only 1/3 of the time. It does NOT look like this for equal probability:</p><p></p><p>AA (B)</p><p>AA (C)</p><p>AB (C)</p><p>AC (B)</p><p>BA (C)</p><p>BB (A)</p><p>BB (C)</p><p>BC (A)</p><p>CA (B)</p><p>CB (A)</p><p>CC (A)</p><p>CC (B)</p><p></p><p>It DOES look like this with the following unequal probabilities:</p><p>AA (B) - 1/18</p><p>AA (C) - 1/18</p><p>AB (C) - 1/9</p><p>AC (B) - 1/9</p><p>BA (C) - 1/9</p><p>BB (A) - 1/18</p><p>BB (C) - 1/18</p><p>BC (A) - 1/9</p><p>CA (B) - 1/9</p><p>CB (A) - 1/9</p><p>CC (A) - 1/18</p><p>CC (B) - 1/18</p><p></p><p>Now let us trace those who wish to quibble the specifics of the problem ("it said #3 was taken away" or "he picks #1").</p><p></p><p>If he picks A, we are left only with....</p><p></p><p>AA (B) - 1/18</p><p>AA (C) - 1/18</p><p>AB (C) - 1/9</p><p>AC (B) - 1/9</p><p></p><p>And if we know C is taken away, we are left only with...</p><p></p><p>AA (C) - 1/18</p><p>AB (C) - 1/9</p><p></p><p>This tells us that you are right <strong>half</strong> as often as you are wrong. NOT 50-50.</p><p></p><p>Again, go do 120 experiments with dice and come back if you are still sure you are right.</p><p></p><p>--The Sigil</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Sigil, post: 352947, member: 2013"] One last time, REAL SLOWLY... 1.) [u]Woman with kids:[/u] 4 possibilities. MM MF FM FF All have equal odds. 50% chance of having one child of each gender. 2. [u]Man with picture of son:[/u] 4 possibilities MM MF FM FF All have equal odds. When he shows a picture of his son, we do NOT then have "MX" and we do not have "XM." We have "MX or XM" which is much different. All we learn is that FF is impossible. In other words, all we learn is that we are chatting with someone from one of the first three groups. That leaves us with a 67% chance of having one child of each gender. 3. [u]Pick, reveal, ask to switch:[/u] 9 possibilities ("choice picked" and "right choice"): AA AB AC BA BB BC CA CB CC We have a one in three chance of being right (AA, BB, CC). When a choice is revealed to be wrong, provided it is NOT the choice we have chosen (bloody loophole-searchers), we get the following: AA (B or C) AB (C) AC (B) BA (C) BB (A or C) BC (A) CA (B) CB (A) CC (A or B) The above all have equal probability - and we are still right only 1/3 of the time. It does NOT look like this for equal probability: AA (B) AA (C) AB (C) AC (B) BA (C) BB (A) BB (C) BC (A) CA (B) CB (A) CC (A) CC (B) It DOES look like this with the following unequal probabilities: AA (B) - 1/18 AA (C) - 1/18 AB (C) - 1/9 AC (B) - 1/9 BA (C) - 1/9 BB (A) - 1/18 BB (C) - 1/18 BC (A) - 1/9 CA (B) - 1/9 CB (A) - 1/9 CC (A) - 1/18 CC (B) - 1/18 Now let us trace those who wish to quibble the specifics of the problem ("it said #3 was taken away" or "he picks #1"). If he picks A, we are left only with.... AA (B) - 1/18 AA (C) - 1/18 AB (C) - 1/9 AC (B) - 1/9 And if we know C is taken away, we are left only with... AA (C) - 1/18 AB (C) - 1/9 This tells us that you are right [b]half[/b] as often as you are wrong. NOT 50-50. Again, go do 120 experiments with dice and come back if you are still sure you are right. --The Sigil [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[OT] mathematical query
Top