Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[OT] Spider-Man...who's interested? (possible spoilers)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richards" data-source="post: 179666" data-attributes="member: 508"><p>I just got back from seeing it with my two sons, and I enjoyed it. I was a little leery going in because of some of the changes I'd heard about (as a long-time comic book collector - as in "I have been collecting comic books for more years on the this Earth than not" - and there's a sobering thought, huh?) and a big-time Spidey fan, I wasn't thrilled when I heard that Peter was going to be generating webs from his own body, but you know what? It didn't bother me in the least. I also prefer the accidental bite from a radioactive spider - call me a purist - but I think they did a good job with the genetically-enhanced super-spider bit as well. My biggest disappointment was the look of the Green Goblin armor [insert Power Rangers reference here], but then I've never really been that big a fan of the Green Goblin anyway, so it didn't bother me too much. (Can you imagine if they used the real - and by "real" I mean of course the comic book version - costume for the movie? Let's face it, that would look equally silly.)</p><p></p><p>My main concerns were that they would do the Spider-Man costume justice - which they did, excellent job - and that they'd do a good job on the characterization of Peter Parker and company - which they did. (Loved that JJJ!) </p><p></p><p>I also liked the fact that they put in a lot of touches that probably didn't matter to the average viewer, but meant a lot to long-time fans. The fact that Betty Brant was there at the Bugle, even if she didn't play much of a role in the movie. The Albert Einstein poster in Peter's bedroom. The mention of "Eddie" at the Bugle. (Surely this is Eddie Brock?) </p><p></p><p>All in all, I thought they did a great job of keeping the spirit of the comic books. I look forward to the sequels no doubt already in the works.</p><p></p><p>And next time, I imagine we'll probably get a new villain. Any guesses? I for one think Doc Ock would make for a great movie villain - I'm sure the special effects department would have a ball with the metal tentacles - or, failing that, maybe Electro. My sons are hoping to see Venom, but I think there's too much backstory to do Venom justice without doing a complete rewrite on his origins.</p><p></p><p>I just hope they don't go the way of the Batman films and decide to cram multiple villains into each movie. That, in my opinion, was a really bad idea.</p><p></p><p>Johnathan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richards, post: 179666, member: 508"] I just got back from seeing it with my two sons, and I enjoyed it. I was a little leery going in because of some of the changes I'd heard about (as a long-time comic book collector - as in "I have been collecting comic books for more years on the this Earth than not" - and there's a sobering thought, huh?) and a big-time Spidey fan, I wasn't thrilled when I heard that Peter was going to be generating webs from his own body, but you know what? It didn't bother me in the least. I also prefer the accidental bite from a radioactive spider - call me a purist - but I think they did a good job with the genetically-enhanced super-spider bit as well. My biggest disappointment was the look of the Green Goblin armor [insert Power Rangers reference here], but then I've never really been that big a fan of the Green Goblin anyway, so it didn't bother me too much. (Can you imagine if they used the real - and by "real" I mean of course the comic book version - costume for the movie? Let's face it, that would look equally silly.) My main concerns were that they would do the Spider-Man costume justice - which they did, excellent job - and that they'd do a good job on the characterization of Peter Parker and company - which they did. (Loved that JJJ!) I also liked the fact that they put in a lot of touches that probably didn't matter to the average viewer, but meant a lot to long-time fans. The fact that Betty Brant was there at the Bugle, even if she didn't play much of a role in the movie. The Albert Einstein poster in Peter's bedroom. The mention of "Eddie" at the Bugle. (Surely this is Eddie Brock?) All in all, I thought they did a great job of keeping the spirit of the comic books. I look forward to the sequels no doubt already in the works. And next time, I imagine we'll probably get a new villain. Any guesses? I for one think Doc Ock would make for a great movie villain - I'm sure the special effects department would have a ball with the metal tentacles - or, failing that, maybe Electro. My sons are hoping to see Venom, but I think there's too much backstory to do Venom justice without doing a complete rewrite on his origins. I just hope they don't go the way of the Batman films and decide to cram multiple villains into each movie. That, in my opinion, was a really bad idea. Johnathan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[OT] Spider-Man...who's interested? (possible spoilers)
Top