Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Ouch?!" - improved crit or +2 damage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SBMC" data-source="post: 2493708" data-attributes="member: 30040"><p><strong>Keep it simple</strong></p><p></p><p>Nice number crunching everyone! Quite impressive - though I go for a simpler approach with the question at hand:</p><p> </p><p>IMO with the plethora of fighters I have played - if you can use it every single attack roll take it. Both of these are "on" every attack role but only one is guaranteed to pay off 100% of the time - provided ya hit at all - but if you critical you hit anyway.</p><p> </p><p>Weapon Specialization like Weapon focus is used every single attack roll without exception. As such I would say get the +2 first; then get Improved Critical later. Especially at low levels where 2 points of damage can make a bigger difference.</p><p> </p><p>I have made tons of criticals with the Improved Critical feat in my portfolio - but again - the +2 every single hit...</p><p> </p><p>Simple math without real math:</p><p>Think about it - if you have a long sword with Improved Critical you have a 4 in 20 chance of making a critical hit - 20% chance per dice roll, without accounting for the need to confirm (which actually drives that percenage down dependant upon you total BAB and modifiers), versus 100% chance of inflciting the 2 points of damage. Plus it gives ya access to inflict 4 points at 12th level (provided your a fighter)</p><p> </p><p>Logic, perhaps supported or not by numbers (which goes all over the place depending on your logic), IMO points towards the guarantee not the gamble.</p><p> </p><p>SBMC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SBMC, post: 2493708, member: 30040"] [b]Keep it simple[/b] Nice number crunching everyone! Quite impressive - though I go for a simpler approach with the question at hand: IMO with the plethora of fighters I have played - if you can use it every single attack roll take it. Both of these are "on" every attack role but only one is guaranteed to pay off 100% of the time - provided ya hit at all - but if you critical you hit anyway. Weapon Specialization like Weapon focus is used every single attack roll without exception. As such I would say get the +2 first; then get Improved Critical later. Especially at low levels where 2 points of damage can make a bigger difference. I have made tons of criticals with the Improved Critical feat in my portfolio - but again - the +2 every single hit... Simple math without real math: Think about it - if you have a long sword with Improved Critical you have a 4 in 20 chance of making a critical hit - 20% chance per dice roll, without accounting for the need to confirm (which actually drives that percenage down dependant upon you total BAB and modifiers), versus 100% chance of inflciting the 2 points of damage. Plus it gives ya access to inflict 4 points at 12th level (provided your a fighter) Logic, perhaps supported or not by numbers (which goes all over the place depending on your logic), IMO points towards the guarantee not the gamble. SBMC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Ouch?!" - improved crit or +2 damage?
Top