Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Our first playtest of 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bjorn2bwild" data-source="post: 4096750" data-attributes="member: 61215"><p>We know "some" of the effects of being prone, and possibly all of the effects of being prone. Yes. standing from prone costs a move action and does draw opportunity attacks. Yes you can crawl while prone at half movement as a move action. Crawling is essentially moving in difficult terrain, so you cannot shift while prone. As such, yes, if you leave a threatened area while prone, you will draw an opportunity attack.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I treated this as no, she was not automatically standing. Tide of Iron is *not* a bull rush. It's similar, but it's not the same thing and does not follow, well, <u>any</u> of the rules for bull rushing. Keep in mind that Tide of Iron does not state that the fighter shifts into the square that her target was previously occupying, but rather states that the fighter "can" shift into that square.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, Tide of Iron does not follow the rules for bull rushing. In the case of this combat, once the attack had successfully landed and the target had been pushed back from its original square, the fighter would not be able to shift into the target's square because you cannot shift in difficult terrain (which essentially is what crawling while prone is).</p><p></p><p>I do see what you're getting at, but I think it's a fundamental difference in how we are interpreting Tide of Iron. You seem to be of the opinion that the fighter must move forward as part of the power. I am of the opinion that the fighter does not have to move forward as part of the power.</p><p></p><p>And while I hope that there are no inconsistencies or loopholes, we all know that's wishful thinking. No new rules system is bulletproof.</p><p></p><p>It's interesting that you mention cleave, as its 4E version caused much more consternation among the group last night than the thought of using powers while prone. The fact that the attack did automatic damage to a second target was the source of the problem. I'm still mulling over what to do about that, or even if it's a big problem. Most people last night thought there should be, at the very least, some sort of attack roll involved. Maybe with bonuses or something.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bjorn2bwild, post: 4096750, member: 61215"] We know "some" of the effects of being prone, and possibly all of the effects of being prone. Yes. standing from prone costs a move action and does draw opportunity attacks. Yes you can crawl while prone at half movement as a move action. Crawling is essentially moving in difficult terrain, so you cannot shift while prone. As such, yes, if you leave a threatened area while prone, you will draw an opportunity attack. I treated this as no, she was not automatically standing. Tide of Iron is *not* a bull rush. It's similar, but it's not the same thing and does not follow, well, [U]any[/U] of the rules for bull rushing. Keep in mind that Tide of Iron does not state that the fighter shifts into the square that her target was previously occupying, but rather states that the fighter "can" shift into that square. Again, Tide of Iron does not follow the rules for bull rushing. In the case of this combat, once the attack had successfully landed and the target had been pushed back from its original square, the fighter would not be able to shift into the target's square because you cannot shift in difficult terrain (which essentially is what crawling while prone is). I do see what you're getting at, but I think it's a fundamental difference in how we are interpreting Tide of Iron. You seem to be of the opinion that the fighter must move forward as part of the power. I am of the opinion that the fighter does not have to move forward as part of the power. And while I hope that there are no inconsistencies or loopholes, we all know that's wishful thinking. No new rules system is bulletproof. It's interesting that you mention cleave, as its 4E version caused much more consternation among the group last night than the thought of using powers while prone. The fact that the attack did automatic damage to a second target was the source of the problem. I'm still mulling over what to do about that, or even if it's a big problem. Most people last night thought there should be, at the very least, some sort of attack roll involved. Maybe with bonuses or something. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Our first playtest of 4E
Top