Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Out of the Abyss OOC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CanadienneBacon" data-source="post: 6792630" data-attributes="member: 11146"><p>Now I'm double glad I posted my comment about readied action and Reaction. I've re-read PHB 193, and it never occurred to me to read it the way you have! I'd been thinking that you got your regular Action, then declared a readied action that would occur (if the trigger occurred at all) on your Reaction. If we put my thinking into play, you'd get both your Action and the Reaction, and the Reaction would pretty much be a second action in one round. There's no disincentive to do that, because the most you're out is your Reaction, while you simultaneously potentially gain two Actions every round (plus a Bonus Action for some of you!).</p><p></p><p>Your thinking makes more sense. You're saying that you use your Action to declare a readied action, and if the trigger occurs then you take your readied action on your Reaction. That's costly to the character--you get an action, but at the cost of both your Action and Reaction. Stated another way, you can ready, but it costs you something to do it. And even if you ready an action, you still only get one Action per round. Honestly, I like that better. It's less amenable to breaking and being warped into something overpowered. Thanks for the clarification.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CanadienneBacon, post: 6792630, member: 11146"] Now I'm double glad I posted my comment about readied action and Reaction. I've re-read PHB 193, and it never occurred to me to read it the way you have! I'd been thinking that you got your regular Action, then declared a readied action that would occur (if the trigger occurred at all) on your Reaction. If we put my thinking into play, you'd get both your Action and the Reaction, and the Reaction would pretty much be a second action in one round. There's no disincentive to do that, because the most you're out is your Reaction, while you simultaneously potentially gain two Actions every round (plus a Bonus Action for some of you!). Your thinking makes more sense. You're saying that you use your Action to declare a readied action, and if the trigger occurs then you take your readied action on your Reaction. That's costly to the character--you get an action, but at the cost of both your Action and Reaction. Stated another way, you can ready, but it costs you something to do it. And even if you ready an action, you still only get one Action per round. Honestly, I like that better. It's less amenable to breaking and being warped into something overpowered. Thanks for the clarification. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Out of the Abyss OOC
Top