Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Out of the Abyss OOC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CanadienneBacon" data-source="post: 6859674" data-attributes="member: 11146"><p>I had the same conundrum when deciding how to adjudicate Kamael's movement taking him out of range of earthen grasp. Earthen grasp has a range of 30'. When Kamael moved to M6, that put him well outside of the spell's 30' range. PHB 202, "Range," provides, "The target of a spell must be within the spell's range." When Kamael relocated to M6, Kuo-toa 7 was no longer in range of either the target or the earthen hand. The spell description for earthen hand provides, "As an action, you can cause the hand to reach for a different creature or to move to a different unoccupied space within range. The hand releases a restrained target if you do either." Holistically, when taken together, I read the PHB entry on Range and the spell description to mean that the caster has to expend an Action to move the earthen hand. If he doesn't do so, and then moves out of range while leaving the hand hanging behind (so to speak), the spell ends.</p><p></p><p>We've got some options. We could roll with what I posted in the IC, which is that the caster needs to expend an Action to move the earthen hand before he himself moves out of range. Or we could say that the spell winks out of existence if the caster moves out of range of the earthen hand (this is what I went with). Or we could say that the hand lets go of its current target and moves spontaneously to be within range of the caster...kind of like a dog following a master. I admit I considered the latter, but opted not to do so for the reason that having the hand move spontaneously is far too open to DM interpretation (where should I have the hand go when the player neglected to mention either the hand's movement or the expenditure of an Action to move the hand), and seems to me to be giving the player a freebie Action that he wouldn't normally be entitled to.</p><p></p><p>That said, I'm open to input. How did you imagine it ought to go?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CanadienneBacon, post: 6859674, member: 11146"] I had the same conundrum when deciding how to adjudicate Kamael's movement taking him out of range of earthen grasp. Earthen grasp has a range of 30'. When Kamael moved to M6, that put him well outside of the spell's 30' range. PHB 202, "Range," provides, "The target of a spell must be within the spell's range." When Kamael relocated to M6, Kuo-toa 7 was no longer in range of either the target or the earthen hand. The spell description for earthen hand provides, "As an action, you can cause the hand to reach for a different creature or to move to a different unoccupied space within range. The hand releases a restrained target if you do either." Holistically, when taken together, I read the PHB entry on Range and the spell description to mean that the caster has to expend an Action to move the earthen hand. If he doesn't do so, and then moves out of range while leaving the hand hanging behind (so to speak), the spell ends. We've got some options. We could roll with what I posted in the IC, which is that the caster needs to expend an Action to move the earthen hand before he himself moves out of range. Or we could say that the spell winks out of existence if the caster moves out of range of the earthen hand (this is what I went with). Or we could say that the hand lets go of its current target and moves spontaneously to be within range of the caster...kind of like a dog following a master. I admit I considered the latter, but opted not to do so for the reason that having the hand move spontaneously is far too open to DM interpretation (where should I have the hand go when the player neglected to mention either the hand's movement or the expenditure of an Action to move the hand), and seems to me to be giving the player a freebie Action that he wouldn't normally be entitled to. That said, I'm open to input. How did you imagine it ought to go? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Out of the Abyss OOC
Top