Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Markn" data-source="post: 4855419" data-attributes="member: 21827">MM2 has some updated wording on Aura.&nbsp; The last paragraph states&quot;If auras overlap and impose penalties to the same roll or game statistic, a creature affected by the overlapping aura is subject to the worst penalty; the penalties are not cumulative.&nbsp; Similarly, a creature in the overlapping area takes damage only from the aura that deals the most damage, regardless of damage type.&quot;So, from this reading, I would have to say that DracoSauve's reading is wrong.&nbsp; Regardless of damage type, same monster or different, you only take damage from the most damaging aura.&nbsp; Thats how I interpret anyways.Again, zone has updated wording as well in the MM2.&nbsp; The last paragraph is virtually identical to aura paragraph listed above.FWIW, how you played it, is how we play it.&nbsp; A zone is a zone, an aura is an aura, a zone is therefore not an aura so we stack the two.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Markn, post: 4855419, member: 21827"] MM2 has some updated wording on Aura. The last paragraph states "If auras overlap and impose penalties to the same roll or game statistic, a creature affected by the overlapping aura is subject to the worst penalty; the penalties are not cumulative. Similarly, a creature in the overlapping area takes damage only from the aura that deals the most damage, regardless of damage type." So, from this reading, I would have to say that DracoSauve's reading is wrong. Regardless of damage type, same monster or different, you only take damage from the most damaging aura. Thats how I interpret anyways. Again, zone has updated wording as well in the MM2. The last paragraph is virtually identical to aura paragraph listed above. FWIW, how you played it, is how we play it. A zone is a zone, an aura is an aura, a zone is therefore not an aura so we stack the two. [/QUOTE]

Verification