Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Overrated/Underrated Geek Media
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9634312" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I'm not trying to be rude, but you're asking for something pretty unreasonable, and you seem to think it's trivial.</p><p></p><p>For someone to find out the actual reviews from the actual time would require literally hours of serious research, by a competent researcher, with proper access to a library of newspapers from 1990, which generally costs money (and may require going to an actual library or the like). There is no "archival reviews" site, and Googling for even 30 seconds would show that.</p><p></p><p>The best you can do, for free, is look on Wikipedia, where some research will already have been done (albeit it often opens with a modern RT/Metacritic score which is often hugely different to the reception at the time), and is usually reasonable accurate, in the "Reception" section.</p><p></p><p>From there we find this, which is undated but I suspect at least near-contemporary (though who knows?) - <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200511234539/https://criticstop10.com/best-movies-of-1990/" target="_blank">Best Movies of 1990 - CriticsTop10</a></p><p></p><p>Seems like critics involved in this voted Goodfellas the #1 movie of 1990, and Dances with Wolves the #2 movie.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dances_With_Wolves#Reception[/URL]</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodfellas#Reception[/URL]</p><p></p><p>EDIT - If I seem a little miffed, it's because I used to work as a researcher, and people thinking gigantic tasks are trivial was something I encountered a fair bit. But when you're working as one, you at least have access to the tools to potentially do something like this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9634312, member: 18"] I'm not trying to be rude, but you're asking for something pretty unreasonable, and you seem to think it's trivial. For someone to find out the actual reviews from the actual time would require literally hours of serious research, by a competent researcher, with proper access to a library of newspapers from 1990, which generally costs money (and may require going to an actual library or the like). There is no "archival reviews" site, and Googling for even 30 seconds would show that. The best you can do, for free, is look on Wikipedia, where some research will already have been done (albeit it often opens with a modern RT/Metacritic score which is often hugely different to the reception at the time), and is usually reasonable accurate, in the "Reception" section. From there we find this, which is undated but I suspect at least near-contemporary (though who knows?) - [URL='https://web.archive.org/web/20200511234539/https://criticstop10.com/best-movies-of-1990/']Best Movies of 1990 - CriticsTop10[/URL] Seems like critics involved in this voted Goodfellas the #1 movie of 1990, and Dances with Wolves the #2 movie. [URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dances_With_Wolves#Reception[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodfellas#Reception[/URL] EDIT - If I seem a little miffed, it's because I used to work as a researcher, and people thinking gigantic tasks are trivial was something I encountered a fair bit. But when you're working as one, you at least have access to the tools to potentially do something like this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Overrated/Underrated Geek Media
Top