Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 1820660" data-attributes="member: 707">I disagree.  Every little bit adds up, and 36k is quite a bit more than "really not alot."  Add that to the 50k for the extra +5 weapon, and you've given your TWF guy an 86,000gp advantage.It doesn't even have to be an additional weapon enchantment, really.  The point is that the 2HF guy has 86k more money to throw around to improve his combat effectiveness.If the cleric is your cohort, sure.  That's another feat spent to get what you want, though.  If the cleric is your companion, then I will say that it has never been my experience that I can simply claim several of the cleric's spells for the day.  If those buffs are going to be cast (and that's the cleric's decision) they'll most likely be cast on the cleric.  After that, if I spend the gold to pick up a Pearl of Power (level 3), (two of them, in the case of the TWF,) another heftly little sum, then sure he'll cast Greater Magic Weapon on me too.  But I don't get to simply claim his spell-slots for myself.  Perhaps it works differently in your games.But if your basic numbers are so simplified as to completely disregard key advantages of one side of the equasion, then they are worthless at best, and misleading at worst.My point in bringing this up is that 3 feats are going to make a huge difference in damage output.  For the feats the TWF guy spends just becoming proficient in his style, the 2HF can increase his combat effectiveness even more.</blockquote>

Verification