Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo Annoucement!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="helium3" data-source="post: 4116664" data-attributes="member: 31301"><p>No, it doesn't. I think their decision makes total business sense considering the lack of a finished GSL at this stage in the game. And if they really do believe that continued support of a 3.5 based game system beyond the point where they could switch to 4E makes sense, I support that decision too. It's their business. They're free to make whatever choices they want.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right. So we're interpreting the paragraph in the same way.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough. The use of the word "sucks" is not warranted. But, saying it "doesn't work for us" is still a criticism of 4E no matter how gently you couch the terms. Particularly in light of the history that these two companies have.</p><p></p><p>Here's a non-RPG example. Let's imagine that Microsoft is about halfway through the period of time between announcing and rolling out their new post-Vista OS. For whatever reason, Microsoft has been unable to provide Dell Computers with the license that Dell will need to sign to install this new OS on their computers when it's released. Because of supply chain issues, Dell has reached a point where they need to announce that Dell Computers with the new OS will not be available for purchase when the new OS itself is released. Dell Computers, instead of saying the above, issues a press release stating that they will stick with the old OS even after they could switch to the new one. Why? Because the old OS is better aligned with the kind of product that they want to sell. They then point out that Alienware, a recently acquired subsidiary that produces custome computers for high end clients will be selling computers with the new OS at the official Go Live date for the new OS.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah. Maybe conciliatory isn't the best word to use. The tone I'm trying to convey is more like, "Hey. WotC hasn't provided us with the GSL yet, and that's unfortunate because we need to announce our new product. It'll have to 3.5 as a result. But that's okay. We'll switch to 4E as soon as we can, without converting any Adventure Paths half-way through.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For what she's saying, she said it about as kindly as she could. I'm just pointing out what she's saying.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="helium3, post: 4116664, member: 31301"] No, it doesn't. I think their decision makes total business sense considering the lack of a finished GSL at this stage in the game. And if they really do believe that continued support of a 3.5 based game system beyond the point where they could switch to 4E makes sense, I support that decision too. It's their business. They're free to make whatever choices they want. Right. So we're interpreting the paragraph in the same way. Fair enough. The use of the word "sucks" is not warranted. But, saying it "doesn't work for us" is still a criticism of 4E no matter how gently you couch the terms. Particularly in light of the history that these two companies have. Here's a non-RPG example. Let's imagine that Microsoft is about halfway through the period of time between announcing and rolling out their new post-Vista OS. For whatever reason, Microsoft has been unable to provide Dell Computers with the license that Dell will need to sign to install this new OS on their computers when it's released. Because of supply chain issues, Dell has reached a point where they need to announce that Dell Computers with the new OS will not be available for purchase when the new OS itself is released. Dell Computers, instead of saying the above, issues a press release stating that they will stick with the old OS even after they could switch to the new one. Why? Because the old OS is better aligned with the kind of product that they want to sell. They then point out that Alienware, a recently acquired subsidiary that produces custome computers for high end clients will be selling computers with the new OS at the official Go Live date for the new OS. Yeah. Maybe conciliatory isn't the best word to use. The tone I'm trying to convey is more like, "Hey. WotC hasn't provided us with the GSL yet, and that's unfortunate because we need to announce our new product. It'll have to 3.5 as a result. But that's okay. We'll switch to 4E as soon as we can, without converting any Adventure Paths half-way through. For what she's saying, she said it about as kindly as she could. I'm just pointing out what she's saying. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo Annoucement!
Top