Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dragonklaw82" data-source="post: 4116882" data-attributes="member: 61145">I have to say that ever since the release of Pathfinder, Paizo has been doing 3e better than WOTC, IMO. Not surprising, since WOTC has been neck-deep in 4e, but I believe that Pathfinder (and Paizo's Dungeon and Dragon run) produced better 3e material than a lot of stuff at WOTC. So since they are so good at it, I'm happy to see that there will be future 3.5 options, because it is a good system, and I love to play it. On the other hand, I do plan on converting to 4e. I like what I have seen, and I think 4e is going to be a fantastcally fun game that fixes all the complaints I had with 3e. I'll admit that not every decision about 4e thrills me, but that can't be helped. I think I will probably play both. I love the work I've seen in Pathfinder, and the future promises to be bright, but here's the problem:D&D remains my priority.Like I said, I'm switching to 4e, so I am going to opt for what I believe to be the next step in an ever-evolving game before I purchase a product that supports an older system. If I have the opportunity to buy both, I will, but it looks like WOTC still gets the bulk of my expendable income at the moment.I wish Paizo good luck in this bold endeavor, but I share the sentiment that the hardline 3.5'ers are not as viable a market as those who switch to 4e.But, Paizo is taking care of that market with the adventure path they are releasing for Necromancer Games, so maybe they are more savvy than most are giving credit.Best of luck, to Paizo. I sincerely hope this new product will be something that makes me want to continue to support what has become the best 3rd party publisher out there.</blockquote>

Verification