Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Primal" data-source="post: 4118623" data-attributes="member: 30678">Also heartily seconded. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />EDIT: My group has been playing since BD&D, and we've always embraced every new edition of the game. This is the first time that the whole group -- based on what we've seen of the rules so far (which is, in fact, quite a lot if you count the "preview" books and all the articles) -- has voted against edition change. Yesterday I phoned everyone and asked them to download the Pathfinder Alpha Rules, and after reading them, they were excited to test them. So you could say that the Pathfinder RPG, despite being still at the playtesting/preview stage, seems to cater to our tastes (mechanically and thematically) a lot better than 4E. Besides, I've got plenty of 3E material and unused ideas left -- probably enough to keep my campaigns running for another 8 years or so. And I don't care if the system will be supported or not -- I've always written my own adventures and I *was* getting tired of those splat books anyway.</blockquote>