Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo Bites- A Rant
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 1471050" data-attributes="member: 16285"><p>I have been pretty vehement in my opinions/statements concerning the whole "Who has the real official DS material" issue.</p><p></p><p>One of the things I have said concerning Paizo is that these (Dungeon 110/111 and Dragon 315/319 are that they are 'one shot' publications. That is Paizo has put out Offical DS material that they won't be supporting in the future. Basically because they can't and still make money. IMO they should focus on what has made Dragon (and Dungeon) great over the years - adding in modular changes. For example new prestige classes or an alternate method to handle defiling/preserving. They should leave the "official" conversion/rules in the hands of those that have dedicated themselves or a portion of their lives to perfroming this task (that is Athas.org and the fans on the fan site).</p><p></p><p>As far as selective editing, well as David pointed out he sold them the material and they can do with it what they wish (and evidently have).</p><p></p><p>One interesting thing though is their (Paizo) lack of recognition of the "official" fansites existence. Dragon 319 had no mention of Athos.org at all, as far as I could see - and I tried to look.</p><p></p><p>I, for one wrote them a scathing letter (via email) concerning their treatments of the Dark Sun (and other things) in Dragon #315. I also know of several other people who sent them similar themed letters, to date there has not been any letters published that are critical to the way they have handled this issue. In fact they have seemingly gone out of their way to emphasize the positive letters they have received. Cooincidence? I don't know since I don't have access to their mail or internal memos.</p><p></p><p>I did appreciate David posting on the WotC forums on this, and subsequently it puts him back into my more favorably received authors now. I had heard (and now believe) that he really does understand the DS setting and what it is (and was) about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 1471050, member: 16285"] I have been pretty vehement in my opinions/statements concerning the whole "Who has the real official DS material" issue. One of the things I have said concerning Paizo is that these (Dungeon 110/111 and Dragon 315/319 are that they are 'one shot' publications. That is Paizo has put out Offical DS material that they won't be supporting in the future. Basically because they can't and still make money. IMO they should focus on what has made Dragon (and Dungeon) great over the years - adding in modular changes. For example new prestige classes or an alternate method to handle defiling/preserving. They should leave the "official" conversion/rules in the hands of those that have dedicated themselves or a portion of their lives to perfroming this task (that is Athas.org and the fans on the fan site). As far as selective editing, well as David pointed out he sold them the material and they can do with it what they wish (and evidently have). One interesting thing though is their (Paizo) lack of recognition of the "official" fansites existence. Dragon 319 had no mention of Athos.org at all, as far as I could see - and I tried to look. I, for one wrote them a scathing letter (via email) concerning their treatments of the Dark Sun (and other things) in Dragon #315. I also know of several other people who sent them similar themed letters, to date there has not been any letters published that are critical to the way they have handled this issue. In fact they have seemingly gone out of their way to emphasize the positive letters they have received. Cooincidence? I don't know since I don't have access to their mail or internal memos. I did appreciate David posting on the WotC forums on this, and subsequently it puts him back into my more favorably received authors now. I had heard (and now believe) that he really does understand the DS setting and what it is (and was) about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo Bites- A Rant
Top