Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="D'karr" data-source="post: 1471090" data-attributes="member: 336">They don't, call Paizo. Their customer service has always been top notch IMO.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Did they not pay Dave for his material? If that is the case then Dave should say something to them. If they paid, as Dave seems to say, then they've fulfilled any obligation they might have had. As a matter of fact they didn't even have to publish anything at all, since they own all rights to the material. Now I'm not going to get up in arms about the 'Geneva Convention' or the remission of 'habeas corpus', etc. Since those topics always bore the crap out of me; when discussed with people that in most instances don't know what they are talking about or are just giving you their opinion. That last comment is a general statement to those that like me, are are not lawyers; not to you BU.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;But they didn't. They chose to publish an altered version that fit the needs of the magazine and the vast majority of D&amp;D players. The magazine is 100% Official D&amp;D content after all; not 100% content for avid DarkSun players. Those people that feel 'betrayed' that their favorite setting was butchered should write to the magazine and complain.&nbsp;I'm a DM and I found the article interesting and useful. Just as interesting and useful as tons of other articles of which I can use only a small portion. Was it DarkSun? No. But if I needed DarkSun material I could always go to <a href="http://www.athas.org/" target="_blank">http://www.athas.org</a> and get more ideas.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="D'karr, post: 1471090, member: 336"] They don't, call Paizo. Their customer service has always been top notch IMO. Did they not pay Dave for his material? If that is the case then Dave should say something to them. If they paid, as Dave seems to say, then they've fulfilled any obligation they might have had. As a matter of fact they didn't even have to publish anything at all, since they own all rights to the material. Now I'm not going to get up in arms about the 'Geneva Convention' or the remission of 'habeas corpus', etc. Since those topics always bore the crap out of me; when discussed with people that in most instances don't know what they are talking about or are just giving you their opinion. That last comment is a general statement to those that like me, are are not lawyers; not to you BU. But they didn't. They chose to publish an altered version that fit the needs of the magazine and the vast majority of D&D players. The magazine is 100% Official D&D content after all; not 100% content for avid DarkSun players. Those people that feel 'betrayed' that their favorite setting was butchered should write to the magazine and complain. I'm a DM and I found the article interesting and useful. Just as interesting and useful as tons of other articles of which I can use only a small portion. Was it DarkSun? No. But if I needed DarkSun material I could always go to [url="http://www.athas.org/"]http://www.athas.org[/url] and get more ideas. [/QUOTE]

Verification