Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo Licenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4697924" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>The cancellation and modification terms seem more generous.</p><p> </p><p>A lot of the generosity has a lot to do with the OGL though. Paizo isn't writing on a blank slate here. Just as having your car repossessed doesn't deny you the use of public roads, losing the Pathfinder Compatability license doesn't deny you the OGL. </p><p> </p><p>Of course, to an actual businessman instead of a forum-kiddie, the morality of a Paizo's IP stance is or ought to be a moot point. A better cancellation clause is a better cancellation clause, whether it was done out of goodwill or out of a need to comply with an existing license from a third party.</p><p> </p><p>As for the morality clause: JUST LIKE THE CANCELLATION AND MODIFICATION CLAUSES IN THE GSL AND THIS LICENSE, it has to be judged as a business matter. It can only be interpreted in the context of assumptions about the future actions of another company. If you believe WOTC is likely to lure you in with the GSL then alter it to screw you over, don't accept it. If you believe that some functionary at Hasbro is going to censor your game, don't accept it. Same thing's true with Paizo.</p><p> </p><p>My best guess as to those business matters? WotC has no intention of screwing over third party publishers by altering the license to hurt them. It also has no intention of being overly picky about the morality clause. And Hasbro doesn't even care. WotC <em>does</em> intend to publish a fifth edition someday, and they don't intend to tell you about it in advance. But they don't intend to do that for a while, and there's probably money to be made in the meantime.</p><p> </p><p>Paizo probably has no explicit plans of a new edition that will make your older products harder to sell. But we're dealing with eight year timeframes here, so who knows what will happen by then. If I had to guess, I'd say that the longer that Paizo publishes independant work the more they'll trend towards creating their own non OGL products, simply because they'll develop more of a unique identity and will want to change the game to match their own style more closely. Paizo likewise won't spend much time monitoring your products for morality, and like WotC, will probably only act if they get complaints or if you do something really icky. On top of that, you always have the OGL to fall back on if you can't work with Paizo for some reason.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4697924, member: 40961"] The cancellation and modification terms seem more generous. A lot of the generosity has a lot to do with the OGL though. Paizo isn't writing on a blank slate here. Just as having your car repossessed doesn't deny you the use of public roads, losing the Pathfinder Compatability license doesn't deny you the OGL. Of course, to an actual businessman instead of a forum-kiddie, the morality of a Paizo's IP stance is or ought to be a moot point. A better cancellation clause is a better cancellation clause, whether it was done out of goodwill or out of a need to comply with an existing license from a third party. As for the morality clause: JUST LIKE THE CANCELLATION AND MODIFICATION CLAUSES IN THE GSL AND THIS LICENSE, it has to be judged as a business matter. It can only be interpreted in the context of assumptions about the future actions of another company. If you believe WOTC is likely to lure you in with the GSL then alter it to screw you over, don't accept it. If you believe that some functionary at Hasbro is going to censor your game, don't accept it. Same thing's true with Paizo. My best guess as to those business matters? WotC has no intention of screwing over third party publishers by altering the license to hurt them. It also has no intention of being overly picky about the morality clause. And Hasbro doesn't even care. WotC [I]does[/I] intend to publish a fifth edition someday, and they don't intend to tell you about it in advance. But they don't intend to do that for a while, and there's probably money to be made in the meantime. Paizo probably has no explicit plans of a new edition that will make your older products harder to sell. But we're dealing with eight year timeframes here, so who knows what will happen by then. If I had to guess, I'd say that the longer that Paizo publishes independant work the more they'll trend towards creating their own non OGL products, simply because they'll develop more of a unique identity and will want to change the game to match their own style more closely. Paizo likewise won't spend much time monitoring your products for morality, and like WotC, will probably only act if they get complaints or if you do something really icky. On top of that, you always have the OGL to fall back on if you can't work with Paizo for some reason. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo Licenses
Top