Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kenada" data-source="post: 9035570" data-attributes="member: 70468">Should it not also be a dealbreaker for those wanting to release content that it can be used by freeloaders in spite of their intent (due to an ambiguity in the license)? Why privilege the wants of freeloaders over the rights of the original authors?I understand if they consider it a dealbreaker now that the intent of the ORC license is clear. I just don’t care. That they were able to get something for nothing before was a bug in the license and not a feature, and it’s been (apparently) fixed.Edit: And yes, there are more options now. If someone wants no conditions imposed on them, they should base their work on permissively licensed content. If the work they want to use as a base is not licensed that way, then they need to respect the license chosen by the original authors (or try to negotiate a special one for their use). To expect otherwise is entitled.</blockquote>