Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JVisgaitis" data-source="post: 4107642" data-attributes="member: 4177">Man, people are tough.On one hand you have Clark from Necromancer who is very excited about producing products for 4e and has been contributing on a thread for 4e monster design from a designer's perspective. Result? Clark is a poster boy for 4e who is blindly loyal to it like he's trying for a money grab or something.On the other hand, we have Erik from Paizo who isn't sure what direction they are going to take 4e. He said it will be a successful edition and all of that, but he just isn't sure if it's the game for him or his customers. Result? Paizo is anti-4e.Is it at all possible for a company to like or dislike 4e because of the actual merits of the system? Does there always have to be some sort of &quot;agenda&quot; for someone's opinions on the game?This isn't politics people, it's D&amp;D. Get a grip and take people's opinions for what they are without blowing everything out of proportion.Rant over.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JVisgaitis, post: 4107642, member: 4177"] Man, people are tough. On one hand you have Clark from Necromancer who is very excited about producing products for 4e and has been contributing on a thread for 4e monster design from a designer's perspective. Result? Clark is a poster boy for 4e who is blindly loyal to it like he's trying for a money grab or something. On the other hand, we have Erik from Paizo who isn't sure what direction they are going to take 4e. He said it will be a successful edition and all of that, but he just isn't sure if it's the game for him or his customers. Result? Paizo is anti-4e. Is it at all possible for a company to like or dislike 4e because of the actual merits of the system? Does there always have to be some sort of "agenda" for someone's opinions on the game? This isn't politics people, it's D&D. Get a grip and take people's opinions for what they are without blowing everything out of proportion. Rant over. [/QUOTE]

Verification