Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo's RPG SuperSTAR Contest Top 32
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ghostwind" data-source="post: 3912725" data-attributes="member: 3060"><p>I find it interesting that there is this much teeth gnashing over something that is essentially an open call. Yes, it is a publicity stunt but an effective one. It did exactly what Paizo had hoped for -- a large response rate and a lot of buzz. Paizo laid down specific guidelines and asked that the entries meet those guidelines. Those that didn't or those that weren't original enough in the eyes of the judges weren't accepted. This is no different than the process other publishers have to go through when vetting submissions for their projects. Heck, I had to go through over 70 pages of open call submissions when I was designing <em>Arms & Armor v3.5</em> and about half that with <em>Pale Designs: A Poisoner's Handbook</em>. It is part of the business, plain and simple. No one is twisting anyone's arm or holding their favorite cuddle toy hostage and insisting that the chosen people move on to stage two. That is up to the individuals. Either they are capable of writing to spec or they are not. I'm amazed at the amount of negativity here and on the Paizo boards about the whole process.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ghostwind, post: 3912725, member: 3060"] I find it interesting that there is this much teeth gnashing over something that is essentially an open call. Yes, it is a publicity stunt but an effective one. It did exactly what Paizo had hoped for -- a large response rate and a lot of buzz. Paizo laid down specific guidelines and asked that the entries meet those guidelines. Those that didn't or those that weren't original enough in the eyes of the judges weren't accepted. This is no different than the process other publishers have to go through when vetting submissions for their projects. Heck, I had to go through over 70 pages of open call submissions when I was designing [I]Arms & Armor v3.5[/I] and about half that with [I]Pale Designs: A Poisoner's Handbook[/I]. It is part of the business, plain and simple. No one is twisting anyone's arm or holding their favorite cuddle toy hostage and insisting that the chosen people move on to stage two. That is up to the individuals. Either they are capable of writing to spec or they are not. I'm amazed at the amount of negativity here and on the Paizo boards about the whole process. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo's RPG SuperSTAR Contest Top 32
Top