Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin Actions - Appropriate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawken" data-source="post: 3671346" data-attributes="member: 23619"><p>I couldn't agree with you more. </p><p></p><p>You can't apply your own morals and ethics to even other cultures without causing problems. Muchless an entirely different species. Muchless irredeemably corrupt fiends that spend eternity tormenting souls. </p><p></p><p>If some people think its wrong to whack an imp just because it hasn't done anything wrong that they witnessed, more luck to 'em! They'll be the ones wishing for a paladin to come in with a Smite when their morality gets shoved right back up their backside by a stronger, meaner fiend that they tried talking to first because it didn't attack them right away! </p><p></p><p>If a paladin doesn't whack an imp because he's got more pressing issues at hand, well, good for him; he knows how to prioritize threats! If he remains silent while his group bargains with an imp that is because he is already planning on dealing with the issue and how to do so best without endangering his companions. Silence does not equal compliance. </p><p></p><p>Wisely, the paladin did best by remaining silent until it was the correct time to act. There was nothing deceptive, chaotic, non-good or even remotely wrong with his actions. The only explanations a paladin owes are to his deity, not to his friends, or even his church or government, but to the one that supplies his power and directs him. Whether he knew of the agreement or not, he did not have to contribute to the discussion and didn't owe his friends any reason or insight for his silence or apparent compliance. </p><p></p><p>If the terms of the group's agreement with the imp come to an end simultaneously with the end of the danger greater than that posed by the imp, then the paladin has the satisfaction of Smiting the imp and at the same time sparing/saving the consciences of his companions by not having Smitten the imp until the terms of their agreement with the imp (and thus any truce) had come to an end so they would not have to worry/dread about any unfulfilled bargains with fiends.</p><p></p><p>Whether the player intended his actions that way or not, it all worked out quite well with the paladin's actions despite calls for penance or power loss. Paladins are not bodyguards. They don't wait for bad things to happen. They go out and bring the Good right to the Bad guys' front door! They should be cheered for taking the initiative, not reprimanded or punished because others do not share their holy mandate or their great desire to see evil purged from the world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawken, post: 3671346, member: 23619"] I couldn't agree with you more. You can't apply your own morals and ethics to even other cultures without causing problems. Muchless an entirely different species. Muchless irredeemably corrupt fiends that spend eternity tormenting souls. If some people think its wrong to whack an imp just because it hasn't done anything wrong that they witnessed, more luck to 'em! They'll be the ones wishing for a paladin to come in with a Smite when their morality gets shoved right back up their backside by a stronger, meaner fiend that they tried talking to first because it didn't attack them right away! If a paladin doesn't whack an imp because he's got more pressing issues at hand, well, good for him; he knows how to prioritize threats! If he remains silent while his group bargains with an imp that is because he is already planning on dealing with the issue and how to do so best without endangering his companions. Silence does not equal compliance. Wisely, the paladin did best by remaining silent until it was the correct time to act. There was nothing deceptive, chaotic, non-good or even remotely wrong with his actions. The only explanations a paladin owes are to his deity, not to his friends, or even his church or government, but to the one that supplies his power and directs him. Whether he knew of the agreement or not, he did not have to contribute to the discussion and didn't owe his friends any reason or insight for his silence or apparent compliance. If the terms of the group's agreement with the imp come to an end simultaneously with the end of the danger greater than that posed by the imp, then the paladin has the satisfaction of Smiting the imp and at the same time sparing/saving the consciences of his companions by not having Smitten the imp until the terms of their agreement with the imp (and thus any truce) had come to an end so they would not have to worry/dread about any unfulfilled bargains with fiends. Whether the player intended his actions that way or not, it all worked out quite well with the paladin's actions despite calls for penance or power loss. Paladins are not bodyguards. They don't wait for bad things to happen. They go out and bring the Good right to the Bad guys' front door! They should be cheered for taking the initiative, not reprimanded or punished because others do not share their holy mandate or their great desire to see evil purged from the world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin Actions - Appropriate?
Top