Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rystil Arden" data-source="post: 3682904" data-attributes="member: 29014"><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :o"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :o"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" />Aww, thanks guys!&nbsp; I admit they weren't exactly supposed to be reductio ad absurdum, particularly the latter one with Percival.&nbsp; That one was just a cool idea I came up with that would put a more human touch on a similar situation (fiend tricks paladin then later is found out).&nbsp; The Pelinor was a bit of reductio on the 'associate' clause.&nbsp; Both were mostly interesting ideas I had while reading this thread.&nbsp; Also, I just like the line 'Holy Erroneous Heironeous'. I'd be thrilled if some GM uses them and then posts back to tell about it!&nbsp; I think the litmus test to find people with similar gaming styles to me whom I'd enjoy gaming is whether they respond to by scenarios by saying 'Oh great, another guy who just likes to screw over Paladins' or 'That's cool!&nbsp; I'd love to play that scenario out'.&nbsp; Because I know I would have fun with those on either side of the screen <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rystil Arden, post: 3682904, member: 29014"] :o :o Aww, thanks guys! I admit they weren't exactly supposed to be reductio ad absurdum, particularly the latter one with Percival. That one was just a cool idea I came up with that would put a more human touch on a similar situation (fiend tricks paladin then later is found out). The Pelinor was a bit of reductio on the 'associate' clause. Both were mostly interesting ideas I had while reading this thread. Also, I just like the line 'Holy Erroneous Heironeous'. I'd be thrilled if some GM uses them and then posts back to tell about it! I think the litmus test to find people with similar gaming styles to me whom I'd enjoy gaming is whether they respond to by scenarios by saying 'Oh great, another guy who just likes to screw over Paladins' or 'That's cool! I'd love to play that scenario out'. Because I know I would have fun with those on either side of the screen :) [/QUOTE]

Verification