NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Whizbang Dustyboots" data-source="post: 6686932" data-attributes="member: 11760">The half-ogre witch literally said almost exactly that -- in Giantish -- as he chopped her head off. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />More seriously, though, this sort of back and forth on paladinhood is explictly part of being a paladin in my campaign. The character in question was once a knight-aspirant in an order that serves the emperor of the church (essentially the pope, especially one with temporal aspirations). During that portion of the campaign, I consciously had a lot of different exemplars of different points of view on paladinhood be among the knights-aspirant and the knights themselves.There are some who are much more in the mode of a Warcraft paladin and are a proactive ass-kicking sort of paladin. There are also others who are much more true blue, Superman-as-Boy-Scout paladins. All of them, as far as the players know, still retain paladinhood, although in the course of that adventure, the player character discovered at least two were now Lawful Neutral fighters who were attempting to get close to the emperor of the church to assassinate him. (The empire is splitting in three and the emperor of the church has recently announced that he's actually the emperor of the temporal empire as well, which does not sit well with everyone.)</blockquote>

Verification