Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin behavior question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 6688903" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>We are actually in agreement. The aim is not to prevent it from being a subject of interest at all, merely to ensure that game mechanics to <em>stay out of the way</em>. If you want your game to actually be like Elric with forces of Law versus forces of Chaos then alignment rules should END debates between players or with DM's about what IS "lawful" - but the gameplay can be ALL ABOUT lawful and chaotic actions by PC's, NPC's and monsters. On the other hand if your game is just a gang of generic adventurers looting mostly forgotten tombs for profit then addition of a LG paladin to the PC rolster should not need to throw the game into a tailspin because: Alignment.</p><p></p><p>Mind you, I think that very few games actually ARE centered around exploration of moral and ethical positions of the characters.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If anything I would believe that it's the absence of such lists in a way. That's because issues with alignment-restricted characters - paladins very much in particular - are the result of "predatory" DMing; "Gotcha!" DMing. Games where whether the DM has really put thought into alignment definitions or not, they use alignment as a hammer to beat over the heads of players and PC's. They wait until the character does something that... bothers them in some fashion, and then brings down the 16-ton weight of alignment enforcement taking the player by complete surprise - and sparking an argument. Players don't have their characters intentionally perform actions that they know to be "violations" without very well-considered intent. They just don't. They don't BECAUSE they don't want their PC's bashed with an alignment hammer. But DM's use alignment to gleefully bait traps and then act as if alignment is to blame when players complain about the consequences of their characters actions. If players knew that the DM would threaten or outright summarilly revoke their characters class or whatever because of what they're doing, <em>they wouldn't do it</em>. And there's the rub - THEY DON'T KNOW <em>NOT</em> TO DO IT. The DM waits to spring the FULL interpretation of allowed alignment actions until the DM has declared that the action CANNOT be changed and the player/PC must suffer the consequences.</p><p></p><p>A simple list of commonly encountered alignment traps and their ALLOWED responses for paladins, rangers, druids, etc. would make those alignment traps all but moot. They'd stop working because players would know the correct responses going in and it would never become an issue. Can the paladin kill orc babies, for example (always a classic alignment trap)? Doesn't matter if the answer is yes or no - if the player has that list of allowed actions/responses to consult then the issue is moot - unless for GENUINE roleplaying reasons the player has the character act differently. Players still get to make the decisions for what their characters will do, but are not simply not caught by surprise when what they THOUGHT was a viable, righteous, or safe choice is instead found to be a horrific moral infraction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 6688903, member: 32740"] We are actually in agreement. The aim is not to prevent it from being a subject of interest at all, merely to ensure that game mechanics to [I]stay out of the way[/I]. If you want your game to actually be like Elric with forces of Law versus forces of Chaos then alignment rules should END debates between players or with DM's about what IS "lawful" - but the gameplay can be ALL ABOUT lawful and chaotic actions by PC's, NPC's and monsters. On the other hand if your game is just a gang of generic adventurers looting mostly forgotten tombs for profit then addition of a LG paladin to the PC rolster should not need to throw the game into a tailspin because: Alignment. Mind you, I think that very few games actually ARE centered around exploration of moral and ethical positions of the characters. If anything I would believe that it's the absence of such lists in a way. That's because issues with alignment-restricted characters - paladins very much in particular - are the result of "predatory" DMing; "Gotcha!" DMing. Games where whether the DM has really put thought into alignment definitions or not, they use alignment as a hammer to beat over the heads of players and PC's. They wait until the character does something that... bothers them in some fashion, and then brings down the 16-ton weight of alignment enforcement taking the player by complete surprise - and sparking an argument. Players don't have their characters intentionally perform actions that they know to be "violations" without very well-considered intent. They just don't. They don't BECAUSE they don't want their PC's bashed with an alignment hammer. But DM's use alignment to gleefully bait traps and then act as if alignment is to blame when players complain about the consequences of their characters actions. If players knew that the DM would threaten or outright summarilly revoke their characters class or whatever because of what they're doing, [I]they wouldn't do it[/I]. And there's the rub - THEY DON'T KNOW [I]NOT[/I] TO DO IT. The DM waits to spring the FULL interpretation of allowed alignment actions until the DM has declared that the action CANNOT be changed and the player/PC must suffer the consequences. A simple list of commonly encountered alignment traps and their ALLOWED responses for paladins, rangers, druids, etc. would make those alignment traps all but moot. They'd stop working because players would know the correct responses going in and it would never become an issue. Can the paladin kill orc babies, for example (always a classic alignment trap)? Doesn't matter if the answer is yes or no - if the player has that list of allowed actions/responses to consult then the issue is moot - unless for GENUINE roleplaying reasons the player has the character act differently. Players still get to make the decisions for what their characters will do, but are not simply not caught by surprise when what they THOUGHT was a viable, righteous, or safe choice is instead found to be a horrific moral infraction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin behavior question
Top