Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladin.. monk?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 2107833" data-attributes="member: 7240"><p>Agreed. I don't allow psionics in my campaigns either for precisely the reasons you articulate here. And I think monks should be treated like psionics -- placed outside of the core and consigned to supplementary material that actually provides sufficient support for them. The big problem with the monk is that the PHB doesn't provide sufficient resources to run a proper Asian-themed world and so the monk limps along as a core class that is pigeon-holed, in most game worlds, into being an outsider.Actually, I complain about those things a lot too. Don't fault me for being inconsistent here.How, Krieg, do any of the statements on your list invalidate the point I'm making? Nobody. I repeat: <strong>NOBODY</strong> whatsoever on this thread is saying that there are not stories about feats of unarmed combat. But none of these stories involve people being better at fighting without weapons than with them. None of these stories involve the heroes deliberately eschewing arms and armour in order to make themselves more effective combatants. NOBODY I repeat: <strong>NOBODY</strong> is taking the position that Western hero narratives don't involve scenes with unarmed combat. A person who <em>can</em> wrestle well is modeled perfectly well with a Fighter with Improved Grapple. A person who <em>can</em> kill people with his fists is modeled perfectly well with a Fighter with Improved Unarmed Strike. </p><p></p><p>Jacob and Odysseus are not modeled well with the Monk class. While it is clear that these characters have Improved Unarmed Strike and Improved Grapple, they also clearly aren't becoming ever lighter. They don't have to avoid armour because using it would screw up their mojo. They aren't blindingly fast either. They didn't learn to do these things well because they grew up as part of ascetic orders that study the perfection of the body. </p><p></p><p>What I am saying here is that the Western tradition lacks stories of characters who are better without weapons and armour than with them. So stop telling me that the Western tradition includes people who can fight unarmed. Every single poster here already knows that. That's not what we're arguing about.Whoa! Stop right there. Are you really stating that the Monk class more closely resembles Hercules than the Fighter class does? </p><p></p><p>While we're at it, Hercules is not a "wrestler" -- he slays the Nemean Lion with his bare hands because it is invulnerable to his weapons of choice: bow and club. Hercules' weapons of choice are not his bare hands. Like Beowulf, he resorts to wrestling only when the weapons fail him. When he fights the Lernaean Hydra, he ends up chopping off its final head with a weapon. He the goes on to shoot Ceryneian Deer...You miss my point here Ace. I'm stating that there is no such PrC because the fact that something is an Olympic event does not mean that (a) it can become a full-time occupation or (b) that a Western heroic archetype will arise from said occupation.Sounds like a fine idea for your character. However, this does not mean that one can make up archetypes. An archetype is an archetype because of its universality. You can't make specialist unarmed fighters a universal in Western literature and myth by fiat. They are or they aren't and you can know whether they are by reading the corpus of literature. Also, on that front, the Olympian ideal was resurrected by the European haute bourgeoisie of the late 19th century because it prized the ideal of amateurism -- the pre-1980s modern Olympics and the Greek Olympics were ideologically hostile to the idea of professional specialist athletes who made their living at it. That's why the idea of Greek wrestler as monk equivalent does a disservice to both Asian and European traditions. </p><p></p><p>So, I ask you guys again: why won't you answer my question and explain why it is so important that you <em>have to</em> find an equivalent to the monk class in the Western tradition. Why does it matter so much? </p><p></p><p>If you want to put a monk in your campaign, just design a setting where the monk makes sense instead of trying to shoehorn this poor nunchuk wielding, shuriken throwing practitioner of Eastern asceticism into a Clunyesque monastery or a Mediterranean gymnasium.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: PS. Plane Sailing's got it right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fusangite, post: 2107833, member: 7240"] Agreed. I don't allow psionics in my campaigns either for precisely the reasons you articulate here. And I think monks should be treated like psionics -- placed outside of the core and consigned to supplementary material that actually provides sufficient support for them. The big problem with the monk is that the PHB doesn't provide sufficient resources to run a proper Asian-themed world and so the monk limps along as a core class that is pigeon-holed, in most game worlds, into being an outsider.Actually, I complain about those things a lot too. Don't fault me for being inconsistent here.How, Krieg, do any of the statements on your list invalidate the point I'm making? Nobody. I repeat: [b]NOBODY[/b] whatsoever on this thread is saying that there are not stories about feats of unarmed combat. But none of these stories involve people being better at fighting without weapons than with them. None of these stories involve the heroes deliberately eschewing arms and armour in order to make themselves more effective combatants. NOBODY I repeat: [b]NOBODY[/b] is taking the position that Western hero narratives don't involve scenes with unarmed combat. A person who [i]can[/i] wrestle well is modeled perfectly well with a Fighter with Improved Grapple. A person who [i]can[/i] kill people with his fists is modeled perfectly well with a Fighter with Improved Unarmed Strike. Jacob and Odysseus are not modeled well with the Monk class. While it is clear that these characters have Improved Unarmed Strike and Improved Grapple, they also clearly aren't becoming ever lighter. They don't have to avoid armour because using it would screw up their mojo. They aren't blindingly fast either. They didn't learn to do these things well because they grew up as part of ascetic orders that study the perfection of the body. What I am saying here is that the Western tradition lacks stories of characters who are better without weapons and armour than with them. So stop telling me that the Western tradition includes people who can fight unarmed. Every single poster here already knows that. That's not what we're arguing about.Whoa! Stop right there. Are you really stating that the Monk class more closely resembles Hercules than the Fighter class does? While we're at it, Hercules is not a "wrestler" -- he slays the Nemean Lion with his bare hands because it is invulnerable to his weapons of choice: bow and club. Hercules' weapons of choice are not his bare hands. Like Beowulf, he resorts to wrestling only when the weapons fail him. When he fights the Lernaean Hydra, he ends up chopping off its final head with a weapon. He the goes on to shoot Ceryneian Deer...You miss my point here Ace. I'm stating that there is no such PrC because the fact that something is an Olympic event does not mean that (a) it can become a full-time occupation or (b) that a Western heroic archetype will arise from said occupation.Sounds like a fine idea for your character. However, this does not mean that one can make up archetypes. An archetype is an archetype because of its universality. You can't make specialist unarmed fighters a universal in Western literature and myth by fiat. They are or they aren't and you can know whether they are by reading the corpus of literature. Also, on that front, the Olympian ideal was resurrected by the European haute bourgeoisie of the late 19th century because it prized the ideal of amateurism -- the pre-1980s modern Olympics and the Greek Olympics were ideologically hostile to the idea of professional specialist athletes who made their living at it. That's why the idea of Greek wrestler as monk equivalent does a disservice to both Asian and European traditions. So, I ask you guys again: why won't you answer my question and explain why it is so important that you [i]have to[/i] find an equivalent to the monk class in the Western tradition. Why does it matter so much? If you want to put a monk in your campaign, just design a setting where the monk makes sense instead of trying to shoehorn this poor nunchuk wielding, shuriken throwing practitioner of Eastern asceticism into a Clunyesque monastery or a Mediterranean gymnasium. EDIT: PS. Plane Sailing's got it right. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladin.. monk?
Top