Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladin.. monk?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Storyteller01" data-source="post: 2108866" data-attributes="member: 20931"><p>It's not that they didn't have an impact so much as one culture's acceptance of violence over the others. There were many occurances where teaching martial techniques in European was forbidden by law, and dueling was (in some areas) as barbarous as whoring (this didn't stop the nobles from doing either, but hey...). This forbiddance wasn't limited to peasantry; in fact, it targeted noble youth to prevent the 'corruption of their state of mind'. It wasn't until the Renaissance that martial training in Europe really shined, but even at that time learning to kill was met with mixed approval.</p><p></p><p>Training with the bow was also noted in some texts as the perview of the peasantry in Europe. While nobility did learn the use of the bow as well as sword and lance, the peasants used the bow on a regular basis: they hunted for their food. Why train hundreds of archers when you can conscript peasants who already know how to use the weapon? Who would admit that being a peasant gives an advantage over a noble?</p><p></p><p>On the asian outlook, even Confusious carried a sword, and the sword is considered one of several holy symbols depending on the religion involved.</p><p></p><p>European history tends to document who did what, but not generally how. No one wanted to know how the other guy died. It was enough that the victor survived.</p><p></p><p>There's also a theory that softer martial arts were developed by monks and professional nobility (samurai and such) as their experience with combat improved. Harder styles were designed to teach peasants and other footsoldiers the essentials as quickily as possible. They had a life expectancy of 0, and you wanted them to do as much damage as possible before they went down. Those in either group who survived passed on their knowledge.</p><p></p><p></p><p>My two cents: It's probably better that the monk be introduced with other asian themed classes. Let's face it, most of the reasons given as to why a monk exists in a European world can be used for Samurai, Wu Jen, Ninja, etc (anyone ever see the Western where a cowboy traveled with a samurai out to retrieve/deliver a family blade?).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Storyteller01, post: 2108866, member: 20931"] It's not that they didn't have an impact so much as one culture's acceptance of violence over the others. There were many occurances where teaching martial techniques in European was forbidden by law, and dueling was (in some areas) as barbarous as whoring (this didn't stop the nobles from doing either, but hey...). This forbiddance wasn't limited to peasantry; in fact, it targeted noble youth to prevent the 'corruption of their state of mind'. It wasn't until the Renaissance that martial training in Europe really shined, but even at that time learning to kill was met with mixed approval. Training with the bow was also noted in some texts as the perview of the peasantry in Europe. While nobility did learn the use of the bow as well as sword and lance, the peasants used the bow on a regular basis: they hunted for their food. Why train hundreds of archers when you can conscript peasants who already know how to use the weapon? Who would admit that being a peasant gives an advantage over a noble? On the asian outlook, even Confusious carried a sword, and the sword is considered one of several holy symbols depending on the religion involved. European history tends to document who did what, but not generally how. No one wanted to know how the other guy died. It was enough that the victor survived. There's also a theory that softer martial arts were developed by monks and professional nobility (samurai and such) as their experience with combat improved. Harder styles were designed to teach peasants and other footsoldiers the essentials as quickily as possible. They had a life expectancy of 0, and you wanted them to do as much damage as possible before they went down. Those in either group who survived passed on their knowledge. My two cents: It's probably better that the monk be introduced with other asian themed classes. Let's face it, most of the reasons given as to why a monk exists in a European world can be used for Samurai, Wu Jen, Ninja, etc (anyone ever see the Western where a cowboy traveled with a samurai out to retrieve/deliver a family blade?). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladin.. monk?
Top