Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Paladin Oaths don't do enough.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6197886" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I am not sure if the suggested changes would be a real improvement, but I do feel that subclasses need to be "large enough", otherwise there will be problems later in capturing/defining some of the archetypes that subclasses are supposed to deliver.</p><p></p><p>For instance, 4 levels worth of subclass features IMO are a bit too few, I'd like at least 5 or 6.</p><p></p><p>The general framework is that you get a certain amount of features from your class, another amount from your subclass, and a third amount from feats (which are generally non-class specific).</p><p></p><p>I don't remember the numbers now, but I think we have some subclasses with as few as 4 features (or at least, 4 levels at which they get subclass features), and others have 6-7. The Cleric is odd because domain spells are granted often, but then the other subclass features are concentrated at very low (1-2) levels and very high levels, but still the choice of subclass is major.</p><p></p><p>At the same time, some classes have as few as 4 feats, and the Fighter has 7. I don't actually mind this difference, I think it would be ok to first decide how much should be defined by class, then how much should be defined by subclass, and finally the number of feats will come as a consequence.</p><p></p><p>But right now I think I want at least that classes like the Paladin would indeed get more from subclasses, which can be achieved by picking a couple of class features and turning them into subclass features.</p><p></p><p>My whole point is that if the set of features gains from the subclass is too small, it might be hard to properly design more subclasses that cover their concept properly. (Of course the opposite problem exists, that if a class' subclasses are too big, then every new subclass requires more design work to fill it up with features).</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>BTW, I would also like all subclasses to start at 3rd level, but that's another matter. For Wizards and Rangers it should be a piece of cake to do so. For Clerics it is trickier due to domain spells, since getting both 1st and 2nd level domain spells at Cleric lv3 might be too much of a sudden boost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6197886, member: 1465"] I am not sure if the suggested changes would be a real improvement, but I do feel that subclasses need to be "large enough", otherwise there will be problems later in capturing/defining some of the archetypes that subclasses are supposed to deliver. For instance, 4 levels worth of subclass features IMO are a bit too few, I'd like at least 5 or 6. The general framework is that you get a certain amount of features from your class, another amount from your subclass, and a third amount from feats (which are generally non-class specific). I don't remember the numbers now, but I think we have some subclasses with as few as 4 features (or at least, 4 levels at which they get subclass features), and others have 6-7. The Cleric is odd because domain spells are granted often, but then the other subclass features are concentrated at very low (1-2) levels and very high levels, but still the choice of subclass is major. At the same time, some classes have as few as 4 feats, and the Fighter has 7. I don't actually mind this difference, I think it would be ok to first decide how much should be defined by class, then how much should be defined by subclass, and finally the number of feats will come as a consequence. But right now I think I want at least that classes like the Paladin would indeed get more from subclasses, which can be achieved by picking a couple of class features and turning them into subclass features. My whole point is that if the set of features gains from the subclass is too small, it might be hard to properly design more subclasses that cover their concept properly. (Of course the opposite problem exists, that if a class' subclasses are too big, then every new subclass requires more design work to fill it up with features). --- BTW, I would also like all subclasses to start at 3rd level, but that's another matter. For Wizards and Rangers it should be a piece of cake to do so. For Clerics it is trickier due to domain spells, since getting both 1st and 2nd level domain spells at Cleric lv3 might be too much of a sudden boost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Paladin Oaths don't do enough.
Top