Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin on Mount + Imp. Evasion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WizDrag" data-source="post: 1614140" data-attributes="member: 18289"><p>Agreed</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not agreed, it stats the rider and mount share saves, it the rider is mounted and the mount avoids say a fireball blast by saving so to does its rider, as long as the rider stays mounted. This works with some effects and not other. Evasion from area spells it does, such as fireball, cone of cold, and such.</p><p></p><p>Some times I think (MO)people see rules in a diffrent way then most. if a fireball covers an area with heat fire blast, to avoid the effects of this you must leave the threatened area. If the Mount saves, it has leaped out of the threatened area, to avoid damage, if he fails, he made it to the far sides of the threatened area, and thus takes half damage. Clearly you can interpid the rules anyway you see fit for your campaign, but as I see it. Leap is for area, and twist is for close combat.</p><p></p><p>EVASION AND IMPROVED EVASION</p><p>These extraordinary abilities allow the target of an area attack to <strong>leap or twist</strong> out of the way. Rogues and monks have evasion and improved evasion as class features, but certain other creatures have these abilities, too.</p><p>If subjected to an attack that allows a Reflex save for half damage, a character with evasion takes no damage on a successful save. </p><p>As with a Reflex save for any creature, <strong>a character must have room to move in order to evade. </strong> A bound character or one squeezing through an area cannot use evasion.</p><p>As with a Reflex save for any creature, evasion is a reflexive ability. The character need not know that the attack is coming to use evasion.</p><p>Rogues and monks cannot use evasion in medium or heavy armor. Some creatures with the evasion ability as an innate quality do not have this limitation.</p><p>Improved evasion is like evasion, except that even on a failed saving throw the character takes only half damage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Dodge bonus only applies to designated opponent. Dodge is a Personal feat, not save. If the attacker were attacking the mount, the mount would get the use of its feat dodge, once the mount has choosen the attacker, the mount then tries to dodge the incoming blows. This is the same for the rider, he may use his dodge bounus, when he has designated an opponent to aviod, or dodge in combat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree, however mounted it stats they share saves. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The way I interpid the rules, you might have to leave your square, if the entire square is threatened, in such case as a fireball, how else is one to aviod the effects. It stats that: a character must have room to move in order to evade. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I understand that some people see the rules diffrently than others. There is nothing wrong with this. I think some people like to shape the rules to help their pc's. If it improves role-play, I am all for it. I know some times the rules do not fully explain every situation. Talk it out with the players and GM at the table. I believe that a person can see what the intended rules a made to do. Rules are not the law, they are a guideline. If you fallow every rule for its face value, and not understand what the rule was intended to do, you can mis-interpid, the logic behind it. Fully try and understant what the rule was meant to accomplish. </p><p></p><p>The game is about having fun, and telling stories with friends. I have many hoserules, and some changes to rules I don't like, So I am far from the innocent person when it comes to the rules. If something does not work in your campaign, make it work or fix it so it does. The important thing is fareness, and fun.</p><p></p><p>The statments above were directed at nobody in particular, they are what they are Statments.</p><p></p><p>This is how we do it at our game table, before or after the game. We talk about the rules and what we think they mean to do. Then we agree on how we are going to play it. Done!</p><p></p><p>I say, "Not all rules are broken", my players say, "and some cannot be fixed!"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WizDrag, post: 1614140, member: 18289"] Agreed Not agreed, it stats the rider and mount share saves, it the rider is mounted and the mount avoids say a fireball blast by saving so to does its rider, as long as the rider stays mounted. This works with some effects and not other. Evasion from area spells it does, such as fireball, cone of cold, and such. Some times I think (MO)people see rules in a diffrent way then most. if a fireball covers an area with heat fire blast, to avoid the effects of this you must leave the threatened area. If the Mount saves, it has leaped out of the threatened area, to avoid damage, if he fails, he made it to the far sides of the threatened area, and thus takes half damage. Clearly you can interpid the rules anyway you see fit for your campaign, but as I see it. Leap is for area, and twist is for close combat. EVASION AND IMPROVED EVASION These extraordinary abilities allow the target of an area attack to [B]leap or twist[/B] out of the way. Rogues and monks have evasion and improved evasion as class features, but certain other creatures have these abilities, too. If subjected to an attack that allows a Reflex save for half damage, a character with evasion takes no damage on a successful save. As with a Reflex save for any creature, [B]a character must have room to move in order to evade. [/B] A bound character or one squeezing through an area cannot use evasion. As with a Reflex save for any creature, evasion is a reflexive ability. The character need not know that the attack is coming to use evasion. Rogues and monks cannot use evasion in medium or heavy armor. Some creatures with the evasion ability as an innate quality do not have this limitation. Improved evasion is like evasion, except that even on a failed saving throw the character takes only half damage. Dodge bonus only applies to designated opponent. Dodge is a Personal feat, not save. If the attacker were attacking the mount, the mount would get the use of its feat dodge, once the mount has choosen the attacker, the mount then tries to dodge the incoming blows. This is the same for the rider, he may use his dodge bounus, when he has designated an opponent to aviod, or dodge in combat. I agree, however mounted it stats they share saves. The way I interpid the rules, you might have to leave your square, if the entire square is threatened, in such case as a fireball, how else is one to aviod the effects. It stats that: a character must have room to move in order to evade. I understand that some people see the rules diffrently than others. There is nothing wrong with this. I think some people like to shape the rules to help their pc's. If it improves role-play, I am all for it. I know some times the rules do not fully explain every situation. Talk it out with the players and GM at the table. I believe that a person can see what the intended rules a made to do. Rules are not the law, they are a guideline. If you fallow every rule for its face value, and not understand what the rule was intended to do, you can mis-interpid, the logic behind it. Fully try and understant what the rule was meant to accomplish. The game is about having fun, and telling stories with friends. I have many hoserules, and some changes to rules I don't like, So I am far from the innocent person when it comes to the rules. If something does not work in your campaign, make it work or fix it so it does. The important thing is fareness, and fun. The statments above were directed at nobody in particular, they are what they are Statments. This is how we do it at our game table, before or after the game. We talk about the rules and what we think they mean to do. Then we agree on how we are going to play it. Done! I say, "Not all rules are broken", my players say, "and some cannot be fixed!" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin on Mount + Imp. Evasion
Top