Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kieperr" data-source="post: 2908752" data-attributes="member: 40226"><p>A suggestion. If you have access to it, the Book of Exalted Deeds, in Chapter 1: The Nature of Good, discusses how creatures of good alignment act and behave within the game. This material applies to all characters of good alignment, not just exalted ones. Exalted characters are simply those good characters that all other good characters strive to emulate (For a real life example, nuns are good, Mother Teresa was exalted). In this chapter is a section on mercy (pg 7). This section states:</p><p>End of paragraph 1: "In a world full of enemies who show no respect for life whatsoever, it can be extremely tempting to treat foes as they have treated others, to exact revenge for slain comrades and innocents, to offer no quarter and become merciless."</p><p>Beginning of paragraph 2: "A good character must not succomb to this trap. <strong>Good characters must offer mercy and accept surrender no matter how many times villains might betray that kindness or escape from captivity to continue their evil deeds.</strong>"</p><p></p><p>A paladin's actions are not based on his opponent's alignment. A paladin's actions are based on the paladin's alignment. A paladin is lawful good and must always act in such a manner. Killing a creature that has surrendered simply because it is evil is basing the paladin's actions on the hobgoblin's alignment. Killing a foe that has surrendered is an evil act no matter what the foe's alignment may be. Killing a good or neutral creature that has surrendered is an evil act and so is killing an evil creature that has surrendered.</p><p></p><p>In DnD it is the alignment of the character commiting the act that matters, not the alignment of the creature the act is commited against. An evil act is an evil act no matter who commits it or whom it is commited against.</p><p></p><p>Within the game you did the right thing. The paladin chose to commit an evil act and he lost his paladinhood because of it. There is no reason for you to worry or feel guilty. Good characters are altruistic. Check the synonyms for altruism in a thesarus. Yahoo reference came up with these: Kindly, charitable interest in others: beneficence, benevolence, benignancy, benignity, charitableness, charity, goodwill, grace, kindheartedness, kindliness, kindness, philanthropy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kieperr, post: 2908752, member: 40226"] A suggestion. If you have access to it, the Book of Exalted Deeds, in Chapter 1: The Nature of Good, discusses how creatures of good alignment act and behave within the game. This material applies to all characters of good alignment, not just exalted ones. Exalted characters are simply those good characters that all other good characters strive to emulate (For a real life example, nuns are good, Mother Teresa was exalted). In this chapter is a section on mercy (pg 7). This section states: End of paragraph 1: "In a world full of enemies who show no respect for life whatsoever, it can be extremely tempting to treat foes as they have treated others, to exact revenge for slain comrades and innocents, to offer no quarter and become merciless." Beginning of paragraph 2: "A good character must not succomb to this trap. [B]Good characters must offer mercy and accept surrender no matter how many times villains might betray that kindness or escape from captivity to continue their evil deeds.[/B]" A paladin's actions are not based on his opponent's alignment. A paladin's actions are based on the paladin's alignment. A paladin is lawful good and must always act in such a manner. Killing a creature that has surrendered simply because it is evil is basing the paladin's actions on the hobgoblin's alignment. Killing a foe that has surrendered is an evil act no matter what the foe's alignment may be. Killing a good or neutral creature that has surrendered is an evil act and so is killing an evil creature that has surrendered. In DnD it is the alignment of the character commiting the act that matters, not the alignment of the creature the act is commited against. An evil act is an evil act no matter who commits it or whom it is commited against. Within the game you did the right thing. The paladin chose to commit an evil act and he lost his paladinhood because of it. There is no reason for you to worry or feel guilty. Good characters are altruistic. Check the synonyms for altruism in a thesarus. Yahoo reference came up with these: Kindly, charitable interest in others: beneficence, benevolence, benignancy, benignity, charitableness, charity, goodwill, grace, kindheartedness, kindliness, kindness, philanthropy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin Question
Top