Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Satyrn" data-source="post: 7304825" data-attributes="member: 6801204">It would be an interesting character, no matter which specific option gets picked. I've played in small groups before. Back when 3e came out, for a long time there were only 3 PCs in my group, so there were always gaps in the roles we could fulfill - especially in the one game when two of us started off as paladins!Heck, for a stretch of time we were only 2, playing a ranger and rogue. I really rather think it might've been less fun if we'd had an NPC tagging along with us, too. It would've spread the focus, changed the challenge.It was fun. There was no need to fill gaps with NPC party members. So I recommend not trying to add in a NPC to fill gaps in the party. The game will still work fine.</blockquote>