Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladins at dinner parties: Polite or Truthful?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Storminator" data-source="post: 447946" data-attributes="member: 305"><p>I believe this is a misreading of the debate. Only one poster advocated pacifism. The primary camp that debates your views does think that the end never justifies the means, but that does not limit that view of paladins to peaceful pursuits only. It limits them in the means they will employ to battle evil.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Emphasis mine. This is the real bone of contention. Neither you nor SHARK has defined a single act which would be out of bounds for a paladin. In fact, SHARK (and the occasional other poster) has advocated acts which I for one consider heinous.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here is the rub. None of the opposing viewpoints are advocating relative morality. That seems to be SHARK's province, and by extension, your position (as you seem to have thrown in with SHARK). SHARK expressly states that paladins can employ the means of their enemies (even if their enemies are rampaging demon hordes!), simply because 1) their enemies are evil, and 2) it works. That makes no allowances for an objective measure of good. </p><p></p><p></p><p>What is uncomfortable is that you seem to believe that the paladin has a special claim to goodness and righteousness, not because he is either good or righteous, but because he kills evil things. Evil kills evil all the time. Standing against evil is not proof positive of goodness. </p><p></p><p>The traits that define good must be established independently of the opposition. Good guys must behave good, and paladins, as the extreme of good guys, must behave good (sounds like miserable grammar to write that <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />) at all times. Failure to do so leads to fallen paladins, even if they are successful on the battlefield.</p><p>Whereas to us, that dark lord sounds like a SHARK paladin!</p><p></p><p></p><p>That may be. Debates of alignment and paladin codes rarely resolve anything. Fun tho! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>PS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Storminator, post: 447946, member: 305"] I believe this is a misreading of the debate. Only one poster advocated pacifism. The primary camp that debates your views does think that the end never justifies the means, but that does not limit that view of paladins to peaceful pursuits only. It limits them in the means they will employ to battle evil. Emphasis mine. This is the real bone of contention. Neither you nor SHARK has defined a single act which would be out of bounds for a paladin. In fact, SHARK (and the occasional other poster) has advocated acts which I for one consider heinous. Here is the rub. None of the opposing viewpoints are advocating relative morality. That seems to be SHARK's province, and by extension, your position (as you seem to have thrown in with SHARK). SHARK expressly states that paladins can employ the means of their enemies (even if their enemies are rampaging demon hordes!), simply because 1) their enemies are evil, and 2) it works. That makes no allowances for an objective measure of good. What is uncomfortable is that you seem to believe that the paladin has a special claim to goodness and righteousness, not because he is either good or righteous, but because he kills evil things. Evil kills evil all the time. Standing against evil is not proof positive of goodness. The traits that define good must be established independently of the opposition. Good guys must behave good, and paladins, as the extreme of good guys, must behave good (sounds like miserable grammar to write that :)) at all times. Failure to do so leads to fallen paladins, even if they are successful on the battlefield. Whereas to us, that dark lord sounds like a SHARK paladin! That may be. Debates of alignment and paladin codes rarely resolve anything. Fun tho! :) PS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladins at dinner parties: Polite or Truthful?
Top