Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin's Divine Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="david_annable" data-source="post: 4268880" data-attributes="member: 67487"><p>During our KotS session last night, a question was raised about the mechanics behind the Paladin's "Divine Challenge" power.</p><p></p><p>The effect description indicates that the paladin marks the target and that the target remains marked until he uses the power against another target, or if he fails to engage the target. To engage the target he challenged, he must either attack the target or end his turn adjacent to it. If he fails to do so, the marked condition ends and he can't use divine challenge on his next turn.</p><p></p><p>The debate arose as to whether the paladin had to continue to engage the target once the mark had been placed? Ie, after the round that he casts divine challenge, is he obligated to continuously engage the target on all subsequent rounds that he wishes that target to remain marked?</p><p></p><p>Standpoint A says that since "marked" is a condition is stated in the power description to last until one of two conditions remove it (the paladin uses the power on someone else or he fails to engage), the paladin has to keep engaging the target to keep it marked.</p><p></p><p>Standpoint B says that once the target is marked by the power (aka, the target was successfully engaged and therefore marked) that they remain marked and only become unmarked when the Paladin uses the power on a new target.</p><p></p><p>Opinions?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="david_annable, post: 4268880, member: 67487"] During our KotS session last night, a question was raised about the mechanics behind the Paladin's "Divine Challenge" power. The effect description indicates that the paladin marks the target and that the target remains marked until he uses the power against another target, or if he fails to engage the target. To engage the target he challenged, he must either attack the target or end his turn adjacent to it. If he fails to do so, the marked condition ends and he can't use divine challenge on his next turn. The debate arose as to whether the paladin had to continue to engage the target once the mark had been placed? Ie, after the round that he casts divine challenge, is he obligated to continuously engage the target on all subsequent rounds that he wishes that target to remain marked? Standpoint A says that since "marked" is a condition is stated in the power description to last until one of two conditions remove it (the paladin uses the power on someone else or he fails to engage), the paladin has to keep engaging the target to keep it marked. Standpoint B says that once the target is marked by the power (aka, the target was successfully engaged and therefore marked) that they remain marked and only become unmarked when the Paladin uses the power on a new target. Opinions? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paladin's Divine Challenge
Top