Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladins in 3.5, why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deadguy" data-source="post: 946225" data-attributes="member: 2480"><p>I just wanted to muddy the waters further by adding that reading through this thread reminded me of some of the Ranger discussions. No, not the 'Ranger was shafted' ones, but the ones where people define what they <em>want</em> from a Ranger class. It turns out that different people have very different ideas about what a Ranger is.</p><p></p><p>So too, it seems, with the Paladin class. Is he (she) a Called Warrior of God? Or the ultimate Chivalrous Knight? Or a Crusader for Justice? Or a Holy Inquisitor? The class seems to need to fit a considerable number of archetypes. In a way, that's a good sign - a sign that the class benefits from being core. But at the same time, the class is written from a limited perspective, and written in such a way that it is very much a question of DM opinion about how much 'give' there is in the class to let it play some of these archetypes.</p><p></p><p>In my heart I know it will stay - it is on of the most fiercely fought over sacred cows of D&D. But with my head I recognise that a more generalised 'Champion' class is useful, with a specific example made of the Paladin, the Champion of Lawful Good. In that sense it would be a little like the 2e move from Magic-User and Illusionist to Mage and Specialist (and yes, I know that neither 2e nor 3e have properly addressed the question of <em>flavour</em> for specialist wizards).</p><p></p><p>At the same time, showing a Prestige Class build of a Paladin would be a useful tool for the DMG. Since we all have the example of the Paladin-as-core-class, it makes it easier to explain how the Paladin can be built as a sample Prestige Class, with the reasoning and limitations explained. It might help get the Prestige Class philosophy deeper into people's minds.</p><p></p><p>As usual, my answer turns out to be 'well all sides have some merits to their arguments...' but, hey, what can you do? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deadguy, post: 946225, member: 2480"] I just wanted to muddy the waters further by adding that reading through this thread reminded me of some of the Ranger discussions. No, not the 'Ranger was shafted' ones, but the ones where people define what they [i]want[/i] from a Ranger class. It turns out that different people have very different ideas about what a Ranger is. So too, it seems, with the Paladin class. Is he (she) a Called Warrior of God? Or the ultimate Chivalrous Knight? Or a Crusader for Justice? Or a Holy Inquisitor? The class seems to need to fit a considerable number of archetypes. In a way, that's a good sign - a sign that the class benefits from being core. But at the same time, the class is written from a limited perspective, and written in such a way that it is very much a question of DM opinion about how much 'give' there is in the class to let it play some of these archetypes. In my heart I know it will stay - it is on of the most fiercely fought over sacred cows of D&D. But with my head I recognise that a more generalised 'Champion' class is useful, with a specific example made of the Paladin, the Champion of Lawful Good. In that sense it would be a little like the 2e move from Magic-User and Illusionist to Mage and Specialist (and yes, I know that neither 2e nor 3e have properly addressed the question of [i]flavour[/i] for specialist wizards). At the same time, showing a Prestige Class build of a Paladin would be a useful tool for the DMG. Since we all have the example of the Paladin-as-core-class, it makes it easier to explain how the Paladin can be built as a sample Prestige Class, with the reasoning and limitations explained. It might help get the Prestige Class philosophy deeper into people's minds. As usual, my answer turns out to be 'well all sides have some merits to their arguments...' but, hey, what can you do? :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Paladins in 3.5, why?
Top