Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kevmann10583" data-source="post: 947585" data-attributes="member: 12506">Sejs, that is just what I am saying, I understand that there are so many interpritations and that no one person can be truly "right"  But that is not our fault, that is the problem of Wizards of the Coast.  They did not describe the paladin and his code in even close to enough description...And you don't even find out untill you read the atonement spell that if a paladen unwillingly or unwittingly does evil they lose their powers.BUT, I here in 3.5 they are giving more description to everything, perhaps they will describe the intracacies of being a paladin and put our argument to rest.But on that same note, I think we have gotten away from whether they should be core or prc.  I opened the poll to see whether people prefered it core or prc, and more then 1/3 said they would like to see it prc.  But it seems the majority want it to remain a core class, and the majority do not want its restrictions to be widened.But that still beggs the question of exactly WHY the paladin should be a core or prc, and I still think that no side has been able to accruatly and infalably defend their side.Is this something we will have to agree to disagree on, and justlet majority rule?  But minorities should be accounted for too, since more then 1/3 belive it should be prc.  Is there a solution to this?  Is there a way to please both sides?I kind of think, since the majority want it, the paladin should be left as a core class (beyond my better judgement), but that they should at least put the varient prc in the varient section of the DMG.</blockquote>

Verification